Talk:Silverstripe
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Largoplazo in topic Proposed merge of Silverstripe CMS with Silverstripe
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Proposed merge of Silverstripe CMS with Silverstripe edit
If either the company or the CMS is notable at all, it still doesn't appear that the company is notable apart from the CMS, so there's no reason to have separate articles, especially since the overwhelming majority of the content in the Silverstripe article is about the CMS. Largoplazo (talk) 02:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- I’m actually going to restore the redirect for now. Okh2019 is not complying with WP:COI - he has declared that he is a paid editor. As such, he needs to create this article through the WP:AFC process and is discouraged from editing this article directly. Red Phoenix talk 21:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
It seems the CMS is notable as it was the subject of a NZ government data breach and was used in international election campaigns:
- https://www.reseller.co.nz/article/666457/imperva-breach-government-web-platform-users-advised-change-passwords/
- https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/silverstripe-ck-118823
Also PS, this talk should probably get linked to from the CMS article. Techhead7890 (talk) 01:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- It is linked from the CMS article. It was tagged automatically when I used Twinkle to propose the merger. Largoplazo (talk) 01:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)