Shigaite is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 14:18, May 21, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
User:Piledhigheranddeeper placed a question regarding whether the anion Na(H2O)6{H2O}6(SO4)2 should have a charge sign. I am quoting directly what the source says, mentioned in the abstract. If anyone else has any input, it is welcome. Chris857 (talk) 23:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Don't have access to the article, but the formula as written would seem to need a charge as it contains one Na+1 and two SO42- as well as being an anion sheet. Rather than "quoting" (as you say) from the abstract, you should see what the body of the article says to clarify. I'll comment out the questioned sentences until clarified. The info should be in a Structure section rather than a general "Description" section with further expansion from the cited article. Vsmith (talk) 02:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
And the article specifically states that the sulfate bearing "sheets" have a 3- charge. Vsmith (talk) 02:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
I just want to mention that mineralogy isn't anywhere near my area of specialty, but I recently found that I can write on minerals (and there are many redlinks out there). The description of the details of the structure are too deep for me, so I will leave that bit to you (and others). Chris857 (talk) 02:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
