Talk:SARS-CoV-1
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | Material from Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus was split to Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus on 17 February 2020 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus. |
vaccine? edit
is there a vaccine for SARS-CoV-1 yet? if yes, it should be added Torzsmokus (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Torzsmokus, this appears to be covered at Severe acute respiratory syndrome#Vaccine. Short answer: they were working on some vaccines, but stopped research before a safe and effective vaccine was fully certified. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- uh my bad, I missed it somehow Torzsmokus (talk) 15:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
History subsections edit
We should divide the history sections into subsections such as reservoir, intermediate host, zoonotic event, animal source, and index case, in order to expand the article. All the aforementioned are currently packed into a single paragraph. Forich (talk) 16:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- No response, and the section still needs work. It is currently giving too much weight (3 or 4 paragraphs) to narrating in detail work from the early years that tried to account for the characteristics of the virus. This can be trimmed a lot, and use the saved space to more concisely add info on the know facts regarding intermediate hosts, zoonotic event, animal source, index case, and early spread. Forich (talk) 17:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
in the Vaccines section, I removed everything and replaced it with a statement from the WHO. this is because the references that were previously there were outdated, or designed for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2), which is not SARS-CoV-1.
ok thanks Jayden Parker (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Rename to SARS-COV-1? edit
It appears most papers now refer to this virus as SARS-COV-1. SacrificialPawn (talk) 19:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress edit
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:35, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress edit
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:SARS-CoV-2 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:52, 17 August 2022 (UTC)