This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
Can we have a comparison of RL and RU numbering in this article as well
please.
Why? It's not a RL vs RU article. It's a RU only article.GordyB (talk) 23:40, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Rugby league evolved from the same source, and its own system relates to older non-standard RU numbering systems.-MacRùsgail (talk)
It's fine to compare older non-standard RU numbering to modern numbering but RL 1895 onwards isn't part of RU history. You might as well bring in soccer (evolved from the same source). AT best RL should be a footnote.GordyB (talk) 19:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Soccer is entirely divergent, but other than the loss of flankers, RL retains the exact same positions as RU, and the numbering system is relevant in that sense.
They might have similar names but they are really not the same positions.GordyB (talk) 16:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
RL numbering is only half reverse; the backs count from back to front, the forwards from front to back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.240.158.52 (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
