I have enjoyed some of my time on this website, but it is not a good use of my time. I am spending my time doing constructive things, rather than wasting my time with the hidebound, and people with even fewer social skills than I have.

Tapadh leibh a chairdean - thank you friends.

Contributions to Scottish History edit

  Scottish History
Thank you for your contributions to promote an understanding of Scottish History Mcfarlib (talk) 15:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Wonder tuft edit

 

A tag has been placed on Wonder tuft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copyvio from the English version of Dwelly's dictonary. Original Gaelic is PD at this point but the English translation is a recent work and is separately copyrighted.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ♠PMC(talk) 17:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Scottish people of Norman descent has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Scottish people of Norman descent, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:03, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Seileag for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seileag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seileag until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave 19:40, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:People associated with the campaign for Welsh devolution has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:People associated with the campaign for Welsh devolution, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:41, 7 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


Nomination for deletion of Template:Footpaths in Scotland edit

 Template:Footpaths in Scotland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Grinner (talk) 06:08, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Lewis has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Lewis, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, MacRusgail. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Portal Scotland listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Portal Scotland. Since you had some involvement with the Portal Scotland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Eilean Bàn listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eilean Bàn. Since you had some involvement with the Eilean Bàn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Douglas, Falkland Islands edit

 

The article Douglas, Falkland Islands has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ElectroChip123 (talk) 02:42, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Literature of England has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Literature of England, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rugby union in Bermuda for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rugby union in Bermuda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby union in Bermuda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — MarkH21 (talk) 03:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Burhou sm02.png edit

 

The file File:Burhou sm02.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by both the infobox locator function and File:Guernsey-Burhou.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 05:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Forth rail bridge panorama by Greg Barbier.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Haymarket.PNG edit

 

The file File:Haymarket.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poor quality orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Georgian surnames for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Georgian surnames is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Georgian surnames until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 16:47, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cornish artists has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Cornish artists has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Camogie in Scotland edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Camogie in Scotland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cornish writers has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Cornish writers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cornish dramatists and playwrights has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Cornish dramatists and playwrights has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cornish non-fiction writers has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Cornish non-fiction writers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cornish poets has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Cornish poets has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hinduism in Scotland edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Hinduism in Scotland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Islands of South Georgia has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Islands of South Georgia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cain bairns edit

 

The article Cain bairns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content in article not confirmed by source used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ernest Spencer's Motherland? edit

Hi MacRusgail! I hope you see this message, even though you appear to not be an active editor anymore.

I see from this edit that you made that someone named Ernest Spencer wrote a poem entitled "Motherland" about the Falkland Islands. I'm curious where this poem might be available; I've been spending time searching to no avail. = paul2520 💬 22:53, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tennis in Scotland edit

 Template:Tennis in Scotland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welsh Lost Lands edit

Your article has been nominated for deletion DragonofBatley (talk) 01:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Legavrik edit

 

The article Legavrik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A dictionary definition - and an incorrect one, as it is "leth-gheamhradh" that is Scottish Gaelic for winter (according to Dwelly's). There are a few trivial mentions of a fair in Inverness of this name, but not enough to say anything.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 20:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Mayfield, Edinburgh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There are insufficient secondary sources to support this article. Its contents are covered more than adequately by the article Newington, Edinburgh

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Welsh Lost Lands for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Welsh Lost Lands is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welsh Lost Lands (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DragonofBatley (talk) 22:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of No Man's Land, Falkland Islands for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article No Man's Land, Falkland Islands is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Man's Land, Falkland Islands until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ArcticSeeress (talk) 18:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Arabian Gulf rugby sevens team for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arabian Gulf rugby sevens team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arabian Gulf rugby sevens team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Unbh (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Vingtaine du Coin Tourgis Nord for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vingtaine du Coin Tourgis Nord is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vingtaine du Coin Tourgis Nord until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

`~HelpingWorld~` (👻👻) 02:59, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Edinburgh in popular culture for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edinburgh in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edinburgh in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rugby union at the 1981 Maccabiah Games for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rugby union at the 1981 Maccabiah Games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby union at the 1981 Maccabiah Games until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:03, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rugby union at the Maccabiah Games edit

 Template:Rugby union at the Maccabiah Games has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:20, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rugby union at the Maccabiah Games for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rugby union at the Maccabiah Games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby union at the Maccabiah Games until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1981 Maccabiah Games events edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:1981 Maccabiah Games events indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1985 Maccabiah Games events edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:1985 Maccabiah Games events indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1989 Maccabiah Games events edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:1989 Maccabiah Games events indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1993 Maccabiah Games events edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:1993 Maccabiah Games events indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1997 Maccabiah Games events edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:1997 Maccabiah Games events indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2013 Maccabiah Games events edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2013 Maccabiah Games events indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Burn (Scotland" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Burn (Scotland and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Burn (Scotland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Argentine rugby union players for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Argentine rugby union players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Argentine rugby union players until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fred Zepelin (talk) 13:59, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Twin Peaks locations has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Twin Peaks locations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BD2412 T 03:11, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Scottish Disciples of Christ edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Scottish Disciples of Christ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Alexander Grigoryants for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Grigoryants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Grigoryants until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  06:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Armenian rugby union players edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Armenian rugby union players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Eàrlaid for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eàrlaid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eàrlaid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 08:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Trendall Crag for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trendall Crag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trendall Crag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 14:11, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

"History of rugby union in England" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect History of rugby union in England has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § History of rugby union in England until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:49, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Rugby union in the Americas has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Rugby union in the Americas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cuban people of Scottish descent edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Cuban people of Scottish descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 1 § Category:Indoor ice hockey venues on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Falkland Islands television people edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Falkland Islands television people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply