Talk:Rockstar New England/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled

Can someone please edit this page and add some more! — Preceding unsigned comment added by InGenX (talk • contribs) 05:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

npov

"emerging force", "spearheadded", and so on. -- Mikeblas 14:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Empire Earth[the first one]

For some reason, Stainless Steal abandoned the EE project, and Mad Doc released the Art of Conquest, I thought that should be mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.76.200.229 (talk) 15:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Move to Rockstar New England

Can someone with more Wikipedia knowledge move Mad Doc Software to Rockstar New England as the studio is being rebranded? Thanks Gamerzworld (talk) 21:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Rockstar New England logo.svg

The image Image:Rockstar New England logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Page cleanup for post-rebranding

I reverted some over-zealous edits by Gamerzworld (talk) from 10 July 2008. Specifically, any references to the company before the acquisition by Rockstar will use the name "Mad Doc". I also broke down the History and Games sections into Mad Doc and Rockstar subsections. I can't contribute to the accuracy of the information, but it should be easier to navigate now. Someone else can take over from here. BlueJaeger (talk) 15:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

History of Bugs

Perhaps there should be some mention of this companies horrible reputation within the gaming community for releasing games that are riddled with bugs, in some cases even completely unplayable at launch. A good example of this would be Bully which aside from a horrible memory leak and multi-core incompatibility contains severe texture issues and an inability to run on any system for an extended period of time with less then 2 gigs of ram or run at all with more. I know forums aren't the greatest sources as their full of complaining no matter what, but see http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=461 . — Preceding unsigned comment added by TopGunSF (talk • contribs) 00:47, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

new networking technology, eh?

I'd like to remove "networking" from the second paragraph of the article unless somebody would care to elaborate on it. ... aa:talk 21:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC)