Talk:Robert Parker (minister)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Eebahgum in topic External links modified

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Robert Parker (minister). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have tried to verify the information given in the webGED above for the supposed parents of Robert Parker (i.e. Robert Parker born before 1550, and Mary Eydith Bruge-Collins), and their associated dates and children, without any success. For various reasons I suspect they are a genealogical fiction or construct, but would be delighted if someone proved me wrong. I cannot find anything reliable in the site amounting to original source citations for these people in the relationships expressed. They do appear in various family trees online on the internet, but seem to have been cloned without any satisfactory source indicated. I have therefore removed these 'parents' from the article page-space as being unverifiable, since this site does not by any means verify them, and have added the nobots sign as suggested to avoid addition of more such material, but I leave the link above for anyone to look at who wants to. If anyone can explain or really verify, please do so. Thanks, Eebahgum (talk) 00:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply