Talk:Ralph Heikkinen

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleRalph Heikkinen has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 24, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 17, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Ralph Heikkinen was the first All-American football player from the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, being raised in the Finnish-American communities of the Gogebic Range?

Auto Peer Review

edit

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 00:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Review

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Well done on this article. There's a few things I've noted that could use some improvement, but for the most part, you've got a very Good Article.

Record of edits:

  • Fixed reference #2 - citation template was missing explicitly named title= parameter, which is required for correct usage
  • Removed redlink to spring practice using popups
  • Corrected grammatical error in "Freshman and sophomore years" - "some form employment" -> "some form of employment"
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    Proper citation templates are needed for references #81 and #92, "Ralph Heikkinen" and "University of Michigan Hall of Honor."
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Citations are needed in the lead section, even if the same information is cited further down the article.
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
    To avoid making the season sections too long, I'd recommend trying to pull all awards out into a separate section. Right now they're scattered in amongst everything else and it's hard to pick out all of the honors he did earn.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    A few more images couldn't hurt. Even if you can't get one of him, try finding a stadium picture that goes along with the article well. Having a large uninterrupted block of text makes for a boring read.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    This easily passes; well done. I'd recommend taking this up to peer review after attempting to address the suggestions above to see what you need to do to get this up to FA status. This is a Good Article. Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ralph Heikkinen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply