Talk:QAnon

Qanons truth

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

First of all, so much of this is wrong. Qanon evolved from the original Anonymous hacktavist group. And in 2012 anonymous announced project mayhem and project Tyler to start a project to make a way to get information out to WikiLeaks safe and anonymously and dump it all to the world. Quinn Michaels https://x.com/quinnmichaels was a huge part of this, now as a lot of anons being atheist and anarchists, they would hide mischievous messages in the code. Then Quinn started asking for donations which is against anonymous creed and anonymous kicked him from the collective. Much of this you can find on x using #tyler or #game23

Well people started to follow it on twitter and Quinn and the guys started to troll people with it, while in the mean time turning project Tyler into a quantum ai program which is now indra.ai https://indra.ai

And you can go through all Quinn's coding and find it all yourself in his GitHub https://github.com/quinnmichaels Or indras open source he made https://github.com/indraai

This is about all I will go into on this right now. I will see if you will allow me to go on with this. If so I will give you references, dox, and archives to prove the truth on the true Qanon... as Quinn Anon Anoneemooseguy (talk) 16:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

We need wp:rs to say this. Slatersteven (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

I have much more. Anoneemooseguy (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

You can research all I said. And get back to me here if you like. I am more than happy to get Quinn's exposure out to this whole fiasco. Anoneemooseguy (talk) 16:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

No, you make a case, you are asked to back it up with sources, you get wp:consensus to make the change (and please read wp:blp, as right now this might well be removable if you continue to make unsubstantiated allegations). Slatersteven (talk) 16:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

i made the case. The references are there. It's all there as said. What do I need to do more to give you references? Go through the hash tags, go through the GitHub. It's all there. Use hashtag #game23 on x you will see. Quinn is Q. I gave you all the refrwncea and proof. Anoneemooseguy (talk) 16:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Read wp:rs and then explain how these sources pass it. Slatersteven (talk) 16:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Try starting here in the GitHub https://github.com/indraai/tyler-guide/blob/master/README.md Anoneemooseguy (talk) 16:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Whatever random documents someone uploaded to GitHub are not likely RS. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Those random githubs have dates. I've also gave you his x which you can go through all of his twitter to all the way back to dates along with Tyler's twitter. Also gave you the website of the actual ai https://indra.ai

If you don't want the truth, cool no problem. Let it be as is. IDC thought ild help. 47.218.203.231 (talk) 16:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

You want to make an edit, it is down to you to do the work, so its simple question.

Provide a quote (just one line) that says he is Qanon? Slatersteven (talk) 16:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Let us know when your "truth" is verifiable. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Also read wp:or, it is not enough for you to analyze wp:primary sources, RS have to have come to the same conclusions as you. Slatersteven (talk) 16:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

do you guys even know what GitHub is? These are actual repositories that are used to run the programs. These are the actual programs. And the dates and all are there, and even deeper in the actual code is all you need to do to find all this out. But again. I did my part. I guess it doesn't need told them if they want to take it down so be it. 47.218.203.231 (talk) 16:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

We know what GitHub is. Read about what a reliable source on Wikipedia is, please. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Still waiting for that quote. Slatersteven (talk) 17:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm over it. Just trying to help.

Take it or leave it. Makes no difference.

I'm a old anon.

I know and was there when it all went down. I find it crazy that people are so swooned by stuff and directed to things to be said one-way or another when it's literally right there.

But Wikipedia has always been a force to print what they deem right or wrong no matter what is literally there or not. Anoneemooseguy (talk) 17:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Still waiting on those references, cause that GitHub link ain't it. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

i got that, but Quinn is not going to say hey I'm q. The Q literally stands for Quinn. You can find all the proof in the code as I said, and all of it through him tagging Tyler and in his programs. But no, there is not going to be anywhere he says oh hey guys I'm q Anoneemooseguy (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

This is not going anywhere I think we can close this. Slatersteven (talk) 17:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Erroneous citation inclusion for lead sentence

I accidentally added a duplicate citation to the lead while fixing a typo in a quote in it. I attempted to remove it as it was included by accident and doesn't support the lead sentence, but I was reverted twice by @Orangemike. Bringing here for further discussion. Isi96 (talk) 05:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

The citation in question is as follows: Thomas, W. F. (February 11, 2022). "Telegram: The Social Network Where Conspiracies Meet". Logically. Archived from the original on March 26, 2023. Retrieved 2023-03-26. Similarly, in the group for Disclose.tv, a sketchy news aggregator site that began as a paranormal and conspiracy theory forum, users shared links to other channels filled with neo-Nazi propaganda. It's cited in the Antisemitism section, but was mistakenly added to the lead. Isi96 (talk) 05:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Subcategory

Category:QAnon is no longer used on biographical articles. Do you think we should create a subcategory called "QAnon followers" (or maybe "QAnon supporters" or "QAnon promoters") ? It might be useful for people like Ron Watkins, Jim Watkins, L. Lin Wood, Lionel and such. Psychloppos (talk) 11:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)