This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Does anyone have any hard information on why this apparently thriving and respected organisation was wound up in the summer of 2020, to be replaced only a few months later by a successor body with almost identical aims and objectives and much overlap of personnel? I suspect some major falling-out behind the scenes; but if there is any public information out there, it would be interesting to know, and to incorporate it into the article. GrindtXX (talk) 17:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
I've now found an editorial in the Burlington Magazine, which casts some light on this, and have added it to the article. GrindtXX (talk) 22:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
