 | A fact from PubWatch appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article name edit
Should it be "Pubwatch" (lower case 'w')? That's how it's shown on its own website.--81.96.190.135 (talk) 16:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I agree that it would be better to be Pubwatch rather than PubWatch. I will make the revisions. Steved1973 (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
I agree that "Pubwatch" would be more appropriate. HenryHayes (talk) 23:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Contested deletion edit
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... The website in question copy and pasted the text straight from the Wiki article. I know this because I wrote the initial wiki article for pubwatch! --Steved1973 (talk) 09:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC) The offending web site that has copy and pasted text directly from wikipedia is http://www.havantdistrict.co.uk/?p=902 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steved1973 (talk • contribs) 09:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)