Talk:Paper or Plastic (song)/GA1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by (CA)Giacobbe in topic GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing the GA for "Paper or Plastic". I look forward to reading the article, and will adding to the review as I go :)! Giacobbe talk 19:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Reviewer: (CA)Giacobbe (talk · contribs) 19:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Overall edit
- Quick question: Why are all of your sources archived? They are barely a year old lol.
- Images or quote boxes would help spruce the article up a bit.
- I do not believe any additional images are necessary for this article; I cannot think of an additional image that would further illustrate the material beyond what is present in the text (especially since it is a very short article). There is actually a quote box in the "Music video" section. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- References should include both the work and the publisher, I've noted that several references are lacking such. I understand that some magazines and online media are published under the same name. In that case I would identify the publisher as such. For example 'Source Example Magazine' would be published under 'Source Example Inc/Ltd/LLC/etc'. Generally they state what they are published under (or their legal title) in the 'About Us' or 'Contact Us' section.
Intro edit
- "It was released as the fourth promotional single from the record."
- Change to "Paper or Plastic" or "The song" — You refer to "Paper or Plastic" as it in the previous sentence, and in the sentence immediately following the one I quoted, you refer to it as the track.
- "Critical response to the song was mixed; some music critics praised the sound while Mike Wass of Idolator criticized it alongside the other promotional singles for the album."
- First bold — Change to "Paper or Plastic", same reasoning as above.
- Second bold — Kinda sounds like you're giving Wass undue weight, might I suggest changing the sentence to - ""Paper or Plastic" garnered generally mixed responses from contemporary music critics; some praised the songs "unusually restrained" sound, while others criticized it alongside the album's previously released promotional singles.
- "which Candy envisioned as a satire on political and socioeconomic repression of women and misogyny"
- First bold — You can link to political satire.
- Second bold — You can link to women's rights.
- Third bold — You can link to as well misogyny as well.
Composition edit
- An audio sample would also go a long way to help give the reader context.
Final thoughts edit
- Other than what I've stated above, everything looks to be very well done. Great work! Giacobbe talk 20:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.