Talk:Oracene Price
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Alonsornunez in topic Potentially libelous material
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled edit
Please feel free to add to the Oracene Price article. Alonsornunez (talk) 06:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Potentially libelous material edit
For the record, potentially libelous material was added to this article by Alonsornunez. That user, and that user alone, also provided the sources for that material. Those sources have not been verified by anyone else. Tennis expert (talk) 19:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- I just removed the potentially libelous material in accordance with WP:REDFLAG. Tennis expert (talk) 10:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Alonsornunez then re-added the material to the article, reinforcing his sole responsibility for it if the material is indeed libelous. Tennis expert (talk) 10:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Alonsornunez wants to make sure that editors have not been deterred from making cited references to notable moments in people lives by specious accusation of potential libel. Peace. AlonsornunezComments 16:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- You'd be well advised to keep in mind that a judge, not you, would have the last word on whether your addition of this "notable moment" is libelous. Tennis expert (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's well-sourced; I don't know why you keep harping on it, Tenex. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Finding "a" source for such a controversial "fact" wouldn't be too impressive to a judge in a defamation suit. You'll just have to trust me on that. Tennis expert (talk) 20:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Bah. This smacks of wikilawyering. Please stop. AlonsornunezComments 03:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Your neck is on the line, not mine. Ignore my advice at your own peril. Tennis expert (talk) 04:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice TenEx. I'm fine. Be well. AlonsornunezComments 04:44, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
It's A Keeper! edit
Congrats to the Oracene article for triumphing over adversity and succeeding. Like a Williams. :-P (Thanks to everyone that's made this article great. Only four days and it's looking pretty good, to my newbie eyes at least! Alonsornunez (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)