Talk:Odyssey Number Five

Fair use rationale for Image:Powderfinger-LikeADog-13sec.ogg

Image:Powderfinger-LikeADog-13sec.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

 Done — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 07:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Powderfinger-My Happiness-23s.ogg

Image:Powderfinger-My Happiness-23s.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

 Done — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 07:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

All Music Review

I am not quite sure what this sentence means; "He also stated that the album achieve success in the American market." and a look at the source didn't help. Please rewrite the sentence for clarity. Good luck with the GA. Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 09:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

 Done - [1] - thanks for picking this up, Matt. Cheers, — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 22:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Good article review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): See above b (MoS): See above notes.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

Article passes all standards. The user did a very good job. I've been watching his work and personally like it. ^Mitch32^contribs 02:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks! — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 02:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Huh?

He also stated that the album achieve success in the American market. - erm...what should go here...just a 'd' on 'achieve' ?cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd say so; I've changed it as such. Probably just a typo. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 08:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Classic case of Engrish. --rm 'w avu 09:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

That's unpossible! Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 09:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Remaining items from previous FAC

Hi all - User:Dihydrogen monoxide asked me to post any follow up comments here to my comments at this article last FAC. It appears that a good amount of additional work has gone into the article to address reviewer concerns - great work! The only problem I still have, really, is that the "'Odyssey' song series" heading still links to the Powderfinger's Oi Song Trilogy article, which is unsourced, although the heading no longer discusses it. --Laser brain (talk) 15:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

OK, link removed. Anything else before we go for FAC again? dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 08:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh well, in my impatience (sorry!) I ended up just going for it again. Please leave any comments there (or here if you wish). Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 10:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Odyssey Number Five. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6EAUDRblm?url=http://www.australian-charts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Powderfinger to http://www.australian-charts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Powderfinger

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)