Talk:Occupational toxicology
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Ash.cobbler in topic Wiki Education assignment: Toxicology
 | A fact from Occupational toxicology appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This page should not be speedy deleted because... edit
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Farsinevisaneiran (talk) 17:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC) this is use of source
no copy
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:54, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that studies in occupational toxicology often focus on early effects that are more subtle than those in clinical medicine? Source: "A scheme for biological monitoring of exposure and of early biological effects is possible only when sufficient toxicologic information has been gathered... Occupational toxicologists and occupational physicians cannot rely solely on the standard diagnostic tools used in clinical medicine, as they were established primarily to reveal advanced pathologic states and not to detect early adverse effects at a stage when they are still reversible. [1], p. 22)
- Reviewed: LeRoy Woodson
- Comment: Literally all text in the previous version of this article was verbatim copyvios of the cited sources. Per Rule A4, this text doesn't count for the length requirement, so this is technically an expansion from zero.
Created by John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk). Self-nominated at 02:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC).
Long enough, neutral, adequately cited. QPQ done. Hook is interesting. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) while I trust you on the fact that the prior version was a copyvio, could you identify the source? I'm happy to do the revdels, but I need to know what it's a copyvio from before I do the deletion. Thanks. Guettarda (talk) 18:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Guettarda: They were just the same sources that were actually cited. If you pick a sentence and search in Google Books you can usually get a snippet view that confirms it's a verbatim copy-paste. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 18:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Toxicology edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2023 and 11 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Scocougs7 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ash.cobbler, Water is not wet 03.
— Assignment last updated by Ash.cobbler (talk) 15:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC)