Talk:Nine Worthies

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Judas Maccabeus actually appears in the Apocrypha, not the Old Testament, so his listing under the latter category is technically incorrect. Willy Logan 07:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

-The Apocrypha is considered by the Roman Catholic Church to be part of the Old Testament. Given that the author of the list was himself Roman Catholic, Maccabeus' listing is in fact correct. Rob 10:22 3 May 2006

The text of this wiki piece bears a strong resemblance ot the text on this page: http://moas.atlantia.sca.org/oak/08/worth.htm

Recent rewrites edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It's now less clear that non-Christians who date from after the rise of Christianity were not eligible for consideration... AnonMoos (talk) 10:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Worthies named in Love's Labour's Lost edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article currently says: "(The three Worthies actually named in the play include two not on the original list, Hercules and Pompey the Great, as well as Alexander.)" But I think more are named in the play - Hector and Judas Maccabaeus at least - see http://web.uvic.ca/~mbest1/ISShakespeare/LLL/LLL5.2c.html - so, was something else meant by the statement? --David Edgar (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Earliest source? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The current article states that the Nine Worthies were first described by Jacques de Longuyon in 1312. But the Dutch version of this article, http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negen_Besten, states that they were described in a text by Jacob an Maerlant which was written "after 1291", but presumable also before ca. 1300 (since that is when Van Maerlant died). Anyone who knows more about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.163.98.151 (talk) 11:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Attributed coat of arms images edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Late 15th-century images of the attributed arms of the worthies have been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons: -- AnonMoos (talk) 02:42, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Jews
Pagans
Christians

There are differences from anything given on external link http://www.heraldica.org/topics/worthies.htm ... AnonMoos (talk) 20:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Here's an alternative version which conforms more to Heraldica.org: -- AnonMoos (talk) 14:44, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Jews
Pagans‎
Christians

Weird Phrase edit

What does this mean? "Together with their male counterparts, they precede Henry VI as he enters Paris in 1431..." They actually existed?? 24.215.163.97 (talk)JamestownArarat

Add topic