Talk:Mount Hōō

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Hōō. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110322202027/https://www.env.go.jp/en/nature/nps/park/parks/minamialps.html to http://www.env.go.jp/en/nature/nps/park/parks/minamialps.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090609164634/http://sokuservice1.gsi.go.jp/datums/ to http://sokuservice1.gsi.go.jp/datums/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Request to compare the two versions neutrally, side by side:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mount_H%C5%8D%C5%8D&diff=prev&oldid=1192764429

On the left-side are the improvements which are required for accuracy, on the right-side are the mistakes which WyenaTheGirl [1] reverted to (perhaps mistakenly, assuming good faith.)

Is it possible we can arrive at a consensus about which improvements on the left-side are inaccurate (if any), compared with the mistakes which WyenaTheGirl reverted to on the right-side?

If the reversion attempt was indeed simply a mistaken (yet understandable) reaction to the number of edits given (totally forgivable), let's please reinstate the accurate improvements now. 240B:12:5381:EC00:F08D:28E2:BF1D:855B (talk) 06:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Same request made to the editor on her talk page at 05:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

https://web.archive.org/web/20231231054823/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:WyenaTheGirl#Request_to_compare_the_two_versions_neutrally,_side_by_side:

Same request made to the editor on my talk page at 05:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

https://web.archive.org/web/20231231061156/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:240B:12:5381:EC00:F08D:28E2:BF1D:855B

So please, let's come to a consensus about what seems to be a mistaken deletion of all the improvements for accuracy plainly viewable on the left-side of this comparison:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mount_H%C5%8D%C5%8D&diff=prev&oldid=1192764429 240B:12:5381:EC00:F08D:28E2:BF1D:855B (talk) 06:15, 31 December 2023 (UTC)