Talk:Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies

The page might or might not be a copyvio, but it does assert notability. If nothing else, stubification is appropriate.--Striver - talk 18:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

On the COPYVIO subject, it is true that much of this text is startlingly reminiscent of that on the official website. Have reworded it somewhat. --AndersW (talk) 20:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

[1] [2] --Striver - talk 14:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

i did not creat this. --Striver - talk 22:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

tag

Why is being "the eldest and largest institution of its kind in Israel" not an assertion of notability? --Striver - talk 13:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

It's an assertion of notability, all right ... just not much of one ... "eldest and largest institution of its kind in Isreal" ... and just how many others are there "of its kind" in this country that (a) has only been around for less than 60 years and (b) has a population that is only three-quarters the size of Los Angeles County? Eldest by how long? Twelve years or twelve months? Largest by how much? Twice a large, or only 25% more members than it's closest competition?

But the numbers are not important ... what is important is a verifiable independent source for the assertion, i.e., from someplace other than the subject's own website!

Granted, you have to rely on the subject of an article for some facts, like membership numbers, which are not generally part of the public record (except that in the US, at least, the circulation of monthly newsletters for incorporated social organizations must be reported annually to the federal government via the US Postal Service, so it is not hard to verify) ... Mensa International (which, BTW, is older than the nation of Israel by two years) says that they have 100,000 members world-wide, with 50,000 in the US and 25,500 in the UK, and we have to take their word for those assertions because it would be very hard independent 3rd party verification of their world-wide membership ... OTOH, the assertion that Mensa "is the largest, oldest, and most well-known high IQ society in the world" is easily verified by multiple independent reliable sources, so many in fact that there is no need to cite any one source ... the fact that the assertion is also mentioned on their website is not what is being used as the only source for the assertion, as is the case with the subject of this article.

So, I'll grant that there is an "assertion of notability," but I challenge the WP:V of the source being used to establish WP:N, i.e., the subject's own website ... that's why I put the {{importance}} template on it, because without any other sources, it sure looks like they're just blowing their own horn ... or would you prefer that I had used a {{notability}} template instead? —72.75.85.159 (talk · contribs) 16:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

I made a simple search and found a link to their site from princton, so considering that and that i did not create this, and not having much interest in it, im leaving it to the fellow editors to continue working on this article. --Striver - talk 19:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070203170112/http://www.dayan.org/framepro.htm to http://www.dayan.org/framepro.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303012727/http://dayan.org/itamar-rabinovich-0 to http://www.dayan.org/itamar-rabinovich-0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)