Talk:Monument to Alexander II (Moscow)

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

A fact from Monument to Alexander II (Moscow) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 August 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the new Monument to Alexander II in Moscow was built on a slope to symbolize that the emperor was an ordinary man, when the monument is viewed from behind?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/August.

Wikipedia

There is also a statue of Nicholas II on his knees nearby. Perhaps we could have a few words about it, either. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 07:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

NPOV anyone? edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What about the massive opposition to rebuilding a statue of a thief and a tyrant which was demolished for good reason. Once again money usurps the will of the poeple.

People can spend their money how they want, what you said was way more POV than the article--64.75.187.197 04:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Request for 2nd photo edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It would be nice to add a photo showing the optical illusion, if such can be found. Regards, Ben Aveling 08:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic