Talk:Lucy Heartfilia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lucy Heartfilia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contribs) 09:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

This might take up to a week, but I'll try to finish this quickly. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Some preliminary comments: I didn't find any copyright violations, and all links are currently working. More comments to follow in the next few days. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Sorry for the late review, as real-life stuff caught up with me. Here's the review.

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   Is there a way to make the Reception section more concise? Per WP:WEIGHT it seems way too long compared to the rest of the article; some trimming might be necessary here. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   See 1a. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

   See 1a. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

   Is there any Japanese discussion about her character? It's fine if there isn't any, but this needs to be clarified first. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Nomination on hold pending responses to my questions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

@Narutolovehinata5: Hello and thank you for providing the review. I trimmed the "Reception" section and made the first two paragraphs (which are the longer ones) approximately equal in size. I hope it is all right now. Regarding the Japanese discussion about Lucy's character, all I managed to find was an interview with Aya Hirano — Lucy's Japanese voice actress — written in Japanese, and I added what Hirano said about Lucy to the "Creation and conception" section. Flowerpiep (talk) 20:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Flowerpiep

The reception section is still a bit too long; perhaps it could be made more concise here. My suggestion is, if possible, it could be reduced to about three paragraphs (right now it's four paragraphs long). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

@Narutolovehinata5: I organised the "Reception" section in three paragraphs and tried to trim it further. Flowerpiep (talk) 23:20, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Flowerpiep

I'm sorry for the late reply, and I apologize if this GAN has taken so long, but I think there are no more problems with the article, and raised issues have been addressed. As such, I am happy to say that this is a pass. @Flowerpiep:, I suggest you nominate this article over at WP:DYK for the chance for it to be featured on the main page. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:24, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Fairy tale symbol.svg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)