This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Isnt this political corectness gone way OTT?> What wrong with Sportswomen? I prpose moving this page to one with the new sensible title. comments?--Light current 17:54, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page moved. Ucucha 02:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Support - undo the ridiculous PC... – ukexpat (talk) 22:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment why is "women" applied to non-adult/non-adolescent females? 70.29.210.242 (talk) 05:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
I want this list deleted. This list is embarrassingly incomplete, lacks useful organization and detail (athlete's nationalities? Teams? Decade/century they were active?) and there are literally hundreds (thousands?) of women athletes who are notable enough to potentially be included in Wikipedia, this list isn't actually feasible in the long run. I think it's best to just scrap this article, and work on adding the appropriate category tags to the biographies of women athletes as they're added to Wikipedia. There is already with sub-categories by sport. OttawaAC (talk) 04:05, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps a better approach would be to set a high criterion for inclusion. As in, multiple Olympic gold medals, or multiple MVP awards.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
This article is implausible. There are far too many female athletes to even try to put them all in this list. Doesn't seem necessary. I'm for deletion. HotshotCleaner (talk) 04:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Why deletion? Pourquoi une suppression ? We could make a list of the most notable women athletes who have an existing page on English Wikipedia. We could classify them by date of birth. I give my list for the Women ice hockey players (User:Genevieve2/sandbox0345). merci --Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 17:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
