Talk:List of assassinated American politicians

Louis Mc Fadden

Is listed here as being poisoned, but his page says "There were two attempts on McFadden's life, a failed shooting and an apparent poisoning that made him "violently ill" after attending a political banquet in Washington. [6][7] He died in 1936 on a visit to New York City" Which implies to me that he wasn't assasinated by poisoning. Shall I remove him?Billsmith453 (talk) 14:43, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

added __NOEDITSECTION__

I turned off the edit function for individual sections because the pictures were pushing all of the edit links down to the bottom all bunched up on one line, at least in Firefox. The __NOEDITSECTION__ tag can be removed once there is enough content in each section to allow the pictures room to breathe.--Old Hoss 19:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Joseph Smith jr.

He was not a politician, but a figure in a religious movement. He does not belong on this page.

He was mayor of Nauvoo, Illinois and a presidential candidate in 1844 (Smith Family). Ben Webber 03:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

I believe that the death of Smith was not an assassination; after all, he was armed and did fire a weapon at his attackers. This seems more like a gang war than an assassination. Cheers. Duke53 | ^Talk 19:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Gang war? 200 v 4 isn't what I'd call a gang war, or a shootout, but w/e. I'm not sure what requirements need to be meet to add a person to this article, but take a look at Death of Joseph Smith, Jr.#Attack by the mob and see for yourself the conditions surrounding his death. Arguments against using "assassination" to describe this event are that 1) he was attacked by a mob, not an "assassin", and 2) this mob violence does not appear to be as carefully premeditated as "assassinations" typically are. However, that Smith was an American politician is without question. ...comments? ~BFizz 14:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

I agree with B Fizz, especially considering there is compelling evidence (this page, about 2/3 of the way down, summarizes it nicely) that one of the significant reasons for his assassination was his candidacy for President. Also, his death was premeditated. It's not like the Carthage Greys just happened to be hanging out at the jail and decided on a whim that they needed to have a... what was the term?... "gang war?" They were there for a purpose, and that purpose was to kill Joseph Smith. (And by the way, the jailer himself allowed Smith to retain the weapon for the protection of himself and his friends. Since when is self-defense inappropriate?) I think someone with more Wikipedia knowledge than myself should be bold, add him, and wait for the firestorm to begin Kingsfold (Quack quack!) 13:16,

23 May 2011 (UTC)

take Linda Collins-Smith off this list, that's obviously not an assassination

who are they all

Wouldn't it be better to have (president) or whatever after each of their names? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SpookyMulder (talk • contribs) 14:25, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

Yes, this should indicate the office held by each. A table format would be nice, as well. Unschool (talk) 22:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay, well I've changed the format to at table. I've picked a sortable table, of course, but that bears explaining a couple of things. I've listed the names in Family Name, Given Name order, so as to faciliate the alphabetical sorting that some might want to do. For much the same reason I've placed the year of death, but not the date: so that one can easily place them in chronological order. I'm certainly open to any criticism, but I think that this makes the information much easier to access than the old format. Unschool (talk) 03:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, one other thing. Normally in an article we do not keep wikilinking a word each time it is repeated, we just do it the first time. I have chosen to handle this differently. Why? Because, once the table gets resorted, what was once the first incidence of the word "Congressman" may now be somewhere else in the table. Unschool (talk) 03:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Changes

Joseph Smiths should be taken off; he's a religious figure, not a politician?

Agree that he should be taken off the list, as it doesn't appear to be an assassination, but rather the killing of a rival gang member. Cheers. Duke53 | ^Talk 19:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

The man killed by Byron Looper should be added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.220.161 (talk) 17:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

MLK

Martin Luther King was certainly a political leader, no? He wasn't an elected official, obviously, but it that the only criteria? Malcolm X should probably be there too... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.127.51.82 (talk) 03:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't think civil rights leaders fall into the category of 'politician'. Politically active, certainly, but not politicians. Their inclusion would change the subject of the list. Lilitou (talk) 18:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

In September 1967 about 2000 people met in Chicago as the National Conference for a New Politics and considered forming a third party with MLK as their presidential candidate. In fact, the effort did not go forward, but MLK probably would have run if it had--he addressed the meeting. Dblobaum (talk) 22:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

George Lincoln Rockwell?

Why is Rockwell in this list? How does he meet the criteria? He was the leader of a small fringe group, was never elected or appointed to any political post. Dblobaum (talk) 22:25, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Diplomats

Would diplomat count as an appointed position? Many US diplomats have been assassinated over the years. Mikebar (talk) 10:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

diplomats are not politicians, as per the title of the article. Kransky (talk) 10:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Recent events

Shouldn't this list include the officials who were victims of Charles Lee "Cookie" Thornton's shooting in Kirkwood, MO on February 7th?

• Kenneth Yost, Public Works Director
• Michael H.T. Lynch, City Council Member
• Connie Karr, City Council Member

24.196.90.38 (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I think it should. I'll get to work on it. -- Big Brother 1984 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Alexander Hamilton?

Paul Wellstone? Wut? Dirtysocks (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I think Alexander Hamilton's death wouldn't be considered an assassination because if I remember correctly, duels are not considered assassinations. Wellstone died in a plane crash that was in no way proved to be an assassination, se he doesn't belong on the list either. HaItsNotOver (talk) 04:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Unschool (talk) 14:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Organizagtion

The chart would be easier to put into context if it were in chronological order. TripOnMyShip (talk) 17:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

By happy cicumstance, this is a sortable table. You can place it in chronological order(or reversible chronological order) by clicking on the funny looking bow-tie symbol at the top of the "Year Killed" column. Likewise you can sort by the name of the assassin, in alphabetical or reverse alphabetical order, by clicking that column, etc. Unschool (talk) 14:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Reported Reasons/Motives

This page would be more useful if there was an additional column that listed the reported reason(s) or motive(s) of the assasin(s). Patterns might be discerned that could indicate why assasinations occur. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoda2000 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Charles Bent

Unless the article is about politicians violently killed by others, being killed by Indians and "New Mexican rebels" shouldn't qualify as an assassination. DOR (HK) (talk) 07:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Personally, I do not know enough about the attack on Governor Bent to speak either way. But in general I would note that even if the killers were acting as a mob, if their objective was, in fact, to kill the Governor specifically, then it would still seem to me to be an assassination. Unschool (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Year

This list should be in order by year. 96.229.193.68 (talk) 06:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

You're in luck! It's a sortable list, which means that, by clicking on the little "bow-tie" in the Year column, it will reorder the list so that they are in order by year. You can even reverse it, so that it goes from the most recent to the most long ago, or vice versa. Unschool (talk) 19:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

I see. Thank. 96.229.193.68 (talk) 19:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

JFK

UH OH, CONTROVERSY~!

In all seriousness, that part saying "According to the Warren Commission" sounds like a very biased and obvious charge of conspiracy that has long since been disproven. It shouldn't be there; it shouldn't say anything regarding conspiracy. There's a whole page already devoted to the subject. AndarielHalo (talk) 14:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

JFK's Assassination is one of the most disputed events in modern history. AndarielHalo even admits this in his comments referring to the pages in Wikipedia talking about the consipriracy theories. Here, he is admitting that LHO being portrayed as the lone gunman is DISPUTED! Thus, for Wikipedia to put Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone perpetrator of this event when MUCH evidence has been presented by multiple credible parties that debunk the Warren Commision's findings is irresponsible and not NPOV (It IS Big Brother's point of view). We must put back into the table that its "LHO, According to the Warren Commision", or "disputed" after LHO with "disputed" linking to the conspiracy pages. Alternatively, we can add Lucien Sarti and a cabal of others including LBJ to LHO as claimed by Howard Hunt in his deathbed confession in a 2007 Rolling Stone article. For more on this point look up CIA Kennedy assassination conspiracy theory. Also, much recent evidence is shown in Nigel Turner's thorough and recently updated (2003) 9 part The Men Who Killed Kennedy Documentary put out by The History Channel. Too much detail has come out in the last 40 years to continue promoting the Lone gunman theory. Evidence of a "smoking gun" and the presence of a dispute about the facts are two different things. The latter is undeniable. 12.49.210.82 (talk) 20:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Was he the Lone Gunman? Yes, you are correct in saying that there are many who doubt this. But there are at least as many who do not. Was he at least an assassin of JFK? No one seriously doubts this. So he belongs in here as an assassin. Do others? Perhaps, but this is disputed, and you will have to develop a consensus to include that here. Unschool 20:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

"Was he at least an assassin of JFK? No one seriously doubts this." This is not true, there are many that doubt it and varied sources have presented a multitude of eye witness testimony in recent years that directly contradict "official accounts". Take a look at the conspiracy pages on Wikipedia for starters. Was LHO involved in the assassination? Did he have some knowledge of what happened that day? Perhaps. This is the "official account", according to the Warren Commission. Some evidence points to his complicity, more so his guilt by association with various characters like Jack Ruby. But to not make any reference to the fact that his LONE involvement IS publicly and currently disputed (especially when Wikipedia, itself, is rife with such Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories, contradicts historical fact. Placing LHO alone in the Assassin's box in the table within this page, implies that he acted alone. This implication is heavily and seriously disputed.

Regarding a consensus, we have one now. Both AndarielHalo and Unschool signal above that LHO as the "Lone Gunman" is a disputed proposition. Unschool says so directly and AndarielHalo mentions conspiracy theories here on Wikipedia that have not all been disproven. Many of these theories are based on testimony and evidence that has recently emerged, directly contradicting "official accounts". To claim that ALL the conspiracy theories have "long been disproven" is FALSE. Therefore, either "(disputed)", "(controversy)" or "(According to the Warren Commission)" should be placed after LHO's name. 12.49.210.82 (talk) 21:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I do not claim that all theories counter to the Warren Commission have been disproven. But a) no single explanation has a greater number of adherents, and b) it remains the "official version", and c) most alternative versions—including, if I am not mistaken, the most serious alternative, the Church Committee findings—include Oswald in on the conspiracy. You will need to acquire a consensus to imply otherwise. Unschool 23:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

a) Before Copernicus and his currently accepted theory of Heliocentrism, most adhered to the thought the Earth was the center of the universe via Geocentrism -- does the popularity of the chronologically former theory make it more accurate? b) Before Louis Pasteur, most in the scientific community thought that diseases were spontaneously generated. Pasteur cemented modern germ theory via his conclusive experiements that diseases primarily come from microorganisms (EG: viruses and bacteria) which grow by reproduction. Can the "official version" change? Would we not agree that the "official version" of JFK's assassination to be widely disputed? c) The House Select Committee on Assassinations which occurred from 1976 up to its final report issued in 1979 followed the 1975 Church Committee hearings. The HSCA intoned that its WAS likely that a conspiracy existed, that there were multiple assailants, and that much of the evidence submitted by the CIA to the HSCA was flawed, amounting to obstruction of justice. In light of this, and not even counting all the evidence compiled since 1979 by other parties, I still don't see why we can't at least replace LHO with "Lee Harvey Oswald (According to the Warren Commission)". This is a fact with which everyone here agrees, right? 12.49.210.82 (talk) 02:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

12.49, your analogies are weak, methinks, if only because heliocentrism and germ theory were concepts that were likely to emerge with more time, whereas the possibility of proving that conspirators were involved in the JFK assassination becomes less likely over time. And the strongest case against the Warren Commission was made by the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations, whose findings were based on a very quick analysis of some now highly-disputed audio evidence.

I won't say that you don't have a point, because you do have some valid arguments. I think it would be best to solicit the opinion of some other experienced editors who understand better than either of us what standards need to be met in order to include your wording. Is that fair? Unschool 03:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

No one who has a triple digit IQ and has read the critics works, especially John Armstrong's book Harvey and Lee: How the CIA Framed Oswald is an "adherent" to the Specter's fairy tale "single bullet theory". The only supporters are the corporate press. You can put "disputed" next to Huey Long's assassin but you can't do for Oswald or Sirhan, when there isn't a shred of proof that shows they killed anyone, or James Earl Ray too for that matter?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.23.21.81 (talk) 18:57, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

James M Hinds

The article says that he was killed by an unknown member of the KKK but his page says he was killed by George Clark, Secretary of the Democratic Committee of Monroe County. Mikenlesley (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Good call, Mike. I checked out the source at James M. Hinds. Looked good to me, so I changed it here. Thanks. Unschool (talk) 13:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

There is a fine reference for this assassination in The Encyclopedia of Unsolved Crimes, by Michael NewtonTrobster (talk) 01:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Harvey Milk

Never mind...found it...dur

I cannot believe that the life and assassination of Harvey Milk in 1978 was not included in the list. He fits the criteria: Elected American Official (Member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors January 8, 1978 – November 27, 1978) and was assasinated, while in office (November 27, 1978).

I think its sad he's been overlooked, especially since his story was recently featured in film, thus making it a current, relevant discussion point.

John Roll

Do we have RS that says John Roll was assassinated, as opposed to just murdered? F (talk) 23:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

NYTimes is saying "Giffords was clearly the intended target". F (talk) 23:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Was Anton Cermak the target? Abductive (reasoning) 16:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Is there a clear distinction? Some dictionary definitions Assination#cite_note-0 are more explicit about the reasons. Others dictionaries are more vague - Concise Oxford English Dictionary: "murder (a political or religious leader)."--Enos733 (talk) 05:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

I sort of wonder if a judge who isn't elected should be considered a politician. Cadwaladr (talk) 01:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I thought that too, but we do list John H. Wood, Jr. and the article says that he was assassinated, not just murdered. hbdragon88 (talk) 01:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Roll should be removed, he belongs on this list instead: List of United States federal judges killed in office. P. S. Burton (talk) 00:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to remove all Federal Judges from the list as they belong on the page listed above.--Found5dollar (talk) 01:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

notable attempts?

Would the page be enhanced if notable attempts were mentioned?

Examples:

George Wallace-- Four term Alabama governor, four time presidential candidate, at the center of the segregation storm, etc. He was shot FIVE TIMES and paralyzed for life, confined to a wheelchair.

Ronald Reagan-- A sitting president was shot to the ground. The bullet was one inch from his heart.

The title of this page is "List of assassinated American politicians". These two examples meet the "American politician" criteria. As for the "assassinated" criteria-- the bloody violence was real, the intent was real. Morbidity in those circumstances is a matter of chance, and mere chance hardly seems a significant enough reason to be listed - or not listed - on Wikipedia.

So I'm wondering about a second list under the main one, but on the same page, for "attempts".

Just a thought. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.235.210.83 (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Uh, NO. The definition of assassination is "To murder (a prominent person) by surprise attack, as for political reasons." Murder requires death, so murder ≠ attempted murder. While there might be cause to have a separate list for attempted assassinations, it seems silly to include the names and circumstances of people who did not die on a list that, by its very definition, requires death as a prerequisite for inclusion. ~~JJEagleHawk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.180.101.29 (talk) 15:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Weiss assasination of Kingfish

Hey I am going to change the term disputed on the assasination page, I know his decendadnts claim he did not do it. But it is certainly less disputed by the public in general as to the assassin was than say JFK. I am just putting this here for comment if someone comes to change it back to "disputed"50.80.150.100 (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Thomas Carmichael Hindman, Jr., Arkansas

There is a fine reference for this assassination in The Encyclopedia of Unsolved Crimes, by Michael Newton Trobster (talk) 01:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Cornelius S. Hamilton

Is this really an assasination? His article claims he was beaten to death by his insane son. It doesn't seem to be politically motivated. 76.87.9.203 (talk) 22:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of assassinated American politicians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130402033125/http://news.yahoo.com/killing-texas-district-attorney-wife-seen-targeted-004859469.html to http://news.yahoo.com/killing-texas-district-attorney-wife-seen-targeted-004859469.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141225063341/http://www.id.uscourts.gov/Content_Fetcher/index.cfml/ILHS_Newsletter_July_2009_1943.pdf?Content_ID=1943 to http://www.id.uscourts.gov/Content_Fetcher/index.cfml/ILHS_Newsletter_July_2009_1943.pdf?Content_ID=1943
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101102223110/http://www.kansascity.com:80/2010/10/30/2372174/70s-slaying-of-kc-politician-a.html to http://www.kansascity.com/2010/10/30/2372174/70s-slaying-of-kc-politician-a.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131021190040/http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/Strang,%20The%20Martyred%20Prophet.htm to http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/Strang,%20The%20Martyred%20Prophet.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080908105006/http://www.stltoday.com:80/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/FB655C8A51D2B402862574BC00544C98?OpenDocument to http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/FB655C8A51D2B402862574BC00544C98?OpenDocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of assassinated American politicians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kansascity.com/2010/10/30/2372174/70s-slaying-of-kc-politician-a.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/Strang%2C%20The%20Martyred%20Prophet.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/FB655C8A51D2B402862574BC00544C98?OpenDocument
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080208212628/http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/DF9F175C2F225844862573E9001BDB9A?OpenDocument to http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/DF9F175C2F225844862573E9001BDB9A?OpenDocument
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100404061014/http://www.kmov.com/news/local/Mayor-of-Washington-Park-found-shot-to-death-89678082.html?hpt=T2 to http://www.kmov.com/news/local/Mayor-of-Washington-Park-found-shot-to-death-89678082.html?hpt=T2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Elisha Johnson, Alexander Hamilton

I've spent several hours working to find what information there is on assassinated Florida State Senator Elisha G. Johnson. Having written that article I thought he belonged here. But there's not a single newspaper article that I can cite as source. So I left it with a reference to the article on him. I hope nobody has a problem with that. It was apparently swept under the rug, deliberately non-publicized at the time. deisenbe (talk) 16:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

I was surprised to find Alexander Hamilton missing, so I put him in. I have no idea what to cite as a source. Way out of my area. deisenbe (talk) 16:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

How Assassination Is Defined: Removing Several of Those Listed

Merriam-Webster defines the word 'assassinate' as "to murder (a usually prominent person) by sudden or secret attack often for political reasons." Many of the politicians included in this list were either not targeted, not killed in a sudden or secret attack, or were not killed for political reasons. A killing does not need to meet all of these criteria to be an assassination, but it has to be distinct from a murder or an unintended death.

Edward Dickinson Baker's death during the Battle of Ball's Bluff should be removed as he was not targeted, he merely died during the course of battle.

Larry McDonald's death as a result of KAL 007 being shot down when it entered Soviet air space does not appear to have been targeted.

Henry Denhardt, after murdering his fiancée, was killed by his fiancée's brothers. This was not about politics; he was just murdered.

Duels tended to result from political disagreements, but they were not sudden or secret; both parties had to agree to take part and set out a time and place. For this reason, Alexander Hamilton, Spencer Darwin Pettis, Jonathan Cilley, and David Colbreth Broderick should be removed.

As I am new, please let me know if there are things I should do differently in the future.

Thank you,

Endnotes (talk) 16:37, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Endnotes

I’m with you all the way (and grateful) until you get to duels. I think they qualify as assassinations. deisenbe (talk) 18:37, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your input. I can easily see how duels could be considered assassinations and would support having them kept in. Endnotes (talk) 01:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Endnotes

I have restored the most famous duel, Hamilton-Burr. Not the other 3 yet. In doing so I stumbled across Category:American politicians killed in duels, and they all should be included. On me mental list of things “to do”, unless someone else does. Many duels were secret as far as the public was concerned (to prevent interference). Hamilton-Burr was. deisenbe (talk) 05:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

I have a hard time seeing Hamilton-Burr as an assassination. So I guess the wikipedia way is to ask to see a reference from an acceptable source who calls it that. Failing that, I am inclined to remove it. Carptrash (talk) 05:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Would you explain just why you have a problem with Hamilton-Burr? By the definition given above (to murder (a usually prominent person) by sudden or secret attack often for political reasons) I thihk it qualifies. It was secret, though not from Hamilton. That’s why they chose Weehawken. Hamilton was prominent. It took place for political, not personal reasons. Do you think “murder” is the problem? Sudden is harder to defend, but the definition says “sudden or secret”. The key point for me is that it was political. Are you saying it was a political murder, but not a political assassination? What’s the difference? Or is that it wasn’t a secret from Hamilton?deisenbe (talk) 09:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

How can you say that this was a "sudden or secret attack?" Both men went out to do this act. Nothing sudden about it. It was planned in advance and while it was carried out secretly, it was no secret to the principles. Or others involved. Carptrash (talk) 17:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Duels most certainly do not count as assassinations, because it is entirely voluntary; both men are there of their own free will and by mutually agreed contract. By contrast, I have a major problem with Denhardt; his death was a revenge murder, not an assassination. I have already removed Hamilton for the reasons I've stated, and I would lobby strongly to remove Denhardt, as well. —Dilidor (talk) 16:33, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

There are a few others here who almost certainly weren't "assassinated" based on the descriptions given or based on their Wikipedia pages: Linda Collins-Smith, Henry Denhardt, W. H. H. Tison, Edwin Stanton McCook, John P. Slough, and Charles C. P. Arndt, which are in reverse chronological order. I'll comment out the ones I'm most confident in for now. Blippy1998 (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

After looking through their pages, I've changed "Linda Collins-Smith" to "Linda Collins" and commented out her entry as well as Denhardt's, Tison's, and Arndt's. Blippy1998 (talk) 09:38, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

SusImposter49 (talk · contribs) re-added them in April 2023, believing them to be "removed without explanation". I have just removed some commenting-out code that was accidentally left behind after those edits. – Fayenatic London 09:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

woops my bad SusImposter49 (talk) 19:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Robert Kennedy

Please have a look at this May 25, 2018, article and add your opinion on whether some version of “disputed”, “conspiracy theories,” or the views of his two children cited should be mentioned. I think it would do more good than harm to mention them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/05/26/who-killed-bobby-kennedy-his-son-rfk-jr-doesnt-believe-it-was-sirhan-sirhan/?utm_term=.301b24cc9518

deisenbe (talk) 12:40, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Would someone check Tomás Romero

and see whether he would fit in. He is described as the alcalde of Taos Pueblo. Carptrash (talk) 04:19, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• George Lincoln Rockwell.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Larry Kuriyama

Someone might want to write up Hawaii state senator Larry Kuriyama, who was assassinated in 1970. I realize that the page only lists figures who have their own Wikipedia page, but Senator Kuriyama's killing shook Hawaii police, prosecutors, organized criminals, and the public to one degree or another for years and would be worthy of an article.72.253.184.202 (talk) 09:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Murders, not Assassinations

AJ Rosier, WHH Tison, and Henry Denhart all appear to be politicians that were murdered for apolitical reasons and therefore not assassinated. Should they be removed? Mr-Knowledge-Guy (talk) 02:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

An assassination does not need to be political. This is a list of politicians who were assassinated, not necessarily assassinated in line of duty. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 04:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Btw, the only member of the US Congress who had died up to 1983 in line of duty was Leo Ryan. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 04:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

I removed several entries back in 2021; they were people killed by spouses or relatives (motive was personal animus, not the victims status as a politician), and a 9/11 victim (wasn't personally targeted). The three mentioned weren't in the list at the time. Denhart should definitely go; there's a clear motive that doesn't have anything to do with his being a politician. Rosier should probably go. There isn't enough information in the Tison article to determine a motive. Plantdrew (talk) 17:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Where does it say in this page that the assassination needs to be political? I encourage you to read the lead of the article assassination. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 20:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Assassinations don't need to be political (John Lennon comes to mind), but not every murdered politician should be considered assassinated. 9/11 victims weren't individually personally targeted; they were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. The fact that one of them happened to be a politician doesn't make his death an assassination. Plantdrew (talk) 22:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

"The fact that one of them happened to be a politician doesn't make his death an assassination." Yes, probably. I have removed myself in the past some pages from categories of assassinated politicians. But you state, " there's a clear motive that doesn't have anything to do with his being a politician". Which is not a requirement for the term "assassination". Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 01:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

For consistency's sake, shouldn't Rosier be taken off? His article repeatedly describes his murder not his assassination Mr-Knowledge-Guy (talk) 05:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Looks like you have a point. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 23:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)