Talk:Lipstick feminism

the proponents and opponents sections need citations

Agreed. Eperotao (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Useful to know in what sense this is feminism?

Without citations and further explanation of how this fits into feminism, I would move to delete. So far, "lipstick feminism" appears to be a phrase more suitable for a dictionary than an encyclopedia entry. Eperotao (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Could this be a subpage for sex-positive feminism? (B2018 (talk) 20:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC))

Lipstick feminism vs. sex-positive feminism

Lipstick feminism seems to share certain characteristics with sex-positive feminism. I think this article should explain what the differences are something something I'm not yet clear on. --Cab88 (talk) 08:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lipstick feminism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311045759/http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_1998_Nov/ai_53215091 to http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_1998_Nov/ai_53215091

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Some of the info in this article is getting sex-positive feminism confused with lipstick feminism. While these two topics are similar and related, they are different in scope and theory. The pictures included in the article are also unrelated and vague. They do not demonstrate the core thoughts of this idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mah599 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

==Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2022 and 21 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LyricRhodes20 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ashley.restel.

— Assignment last updated by Mlclark1 (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-02

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Chumbina (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Cerade.

— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Criticism as Praxis

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Melanieeeedawson (article contribs). Peer reviewers: TherealHarv, Wolfpack3810.

— Assignment last updated by CarsonJones06 (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2023 and 8 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Destiinyespinoza (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Yuliana Acevedo.

— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 20:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies-17

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 February 2023 and 19 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sqygkiwi (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Obliviousmag (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Bust Magazine Subsection

There is already a wikipedia page for Bust (magazine). How should we best incorporate that into the "in Media" section of the article? Would it be best linked under the See Also section or should the already existing page be linked with a short introductory paragraph?

If there is a good list of more publications, it could be included that way in place of the subsection it is in right now.Jiltedsquirrel (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Suffragist vs. Suffragette

Suffragist was the word used to describe women fighting for the right to vote, in the U.S. In Britain, where the word suffragette was reclaimed from a reported to empower themselves. The suffragists in the U.S. thought that the "ette" ending was used to diminish their work and the importance of women voting. So, the folks who opposed women's right to vote often called them "suffragettes." Just another example of power embedded in words and what they mean, who uses them, how they are used as weapons and for empowerment. Here is a quote from the National Parks as a source:

"The battle for woman’s suffrage was in full force in both Britain and the United States in the early 1900s. Reporters took sides, and in 1906, a British reporter used the word “suffragette” to mock those fighting for women’s right to vote. The suffix “-ette” is used to refer to something small or diminutive, and the reporter used it to minimize the work of British suffragists." https://www.nps.gov/articles/suffragistvssuffragette.htm

Here is a source in South Australia that will tell you the words marked different generations of the movement: https://officeforwomen.sa.gov.au/womens-policy/125th-anniversary-of-suffrage/suffragistsuffragette-whats-the-difference#:~:text=Suffragists%20believed%20in%20peaceful%2C%20constitutional,militant%20action%20for%20the%20cause. Handsome-panther (talk) 20:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)