Talk:Liebster Jesu, mein Verlangen, BWV 32
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Dr. Blofeld in topic GA Review
 | Liebster Jesu, mein Verlangen, BWV 32 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 10, 2016. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Bach composed the cantata for the Sunday after Epiphany, Liebster Jesu, mein Verlangen, BWV 32, as a dialogue of the Soul and Jesus, using elements of contemporary opera? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Liebster Jesu, mein Verlangen, BWV 32/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 23:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Link Darmstadt in lede and history.
- yes --GA
- "Lehms treated the Gospel to an allegorical dialogue of Jesus and the Soul, staying close to the Gospel." -avoid rep of Gospel
- removed the earlier wording at the end --GA
- Why are the keys in the table all linked except B minor?
- thank you --GA (because one source had e minor which was linked before, and when I changed I forgot to link)
- "The keys and time signatures are taken from the book on all cantatas by the Bach scholar Alfred Dürr," -why not just mention the name of the book?
- Do you think the title conveys how general that book is? meaning that facts about other cantatas can also be sourced to it? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- You could word it like "The keys and time signatures are taken from xxx, a book by the Bach scholar Alfred Dürr which features facts about the cantatas".
- That would be a rather long title in German (Die Kantaten von Johann Sebastian Bach), which is given in the ref anyway, - do you think it helps the English reader at this point? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oh OK, don't worry then.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- That would be a rather long title in German (Die Kantaten von Johann Sebastian Bach), which is given in the ref anyway, - do you think it helps the English reader at this point? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- You could word it like "The keys and time signatures are taken from xxx, a book by the Bach scholar Alfred Dürr which features facts about the cantatas".
- Do you think the title conveys how general that book is? meaning that facts about other cantatas can also be sourced to it? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Looks fine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)