This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Joe Arpaio#Investigation of Federal Judge and DOJ|investigate the DOJ]] The anchor (#Investigation of Federal Judge and DOJ) has been deleted by other users before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I can't believe that this guy's wikipedia page has ZERO RESULTS when searched for "children". It was found as fact by a trial court, reaffirmed by an appellate court, and that reaffirmation was affirmed by another appellate court. It all factual, government-sourced information, zero validity issues at all whatsoever. But before I add it. . . educate me as to what I must be missing here. . . ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.110.115.4 (talk) 09:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
WP:BLP. This is especially so in this case because there are allegations and Klayman's denials. A BLP-compliant version would have to include many details and specifics, to properly frame that the initial court's finding was inferred from Klayman's refusal to answer certain questions. In addition, the court's findings were published in newspapers, and Klayman promptly sued them for defamation. Yes, the newspapers eventually won, but defending lawsuits isn't free. --Weazie (talk) 19:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Also, this topic was twice discussed in the archives; one discussion linked to a BLP-noticeboard discussion about Klayman. --Weazie (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
