Talk:Kyle Kulinski
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Mottezen in topic Is this guy notable?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kyle Kulinski article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | There is discussion of this article and its sources at User talk:Trackinfo/Kyle Kulinski. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Kyle dating Krystal Ball edit
Not sure I agree with this revert. The information is sourced to a secondary source, and the news is relevant. Krystal Ball has her own Wikipedia article and is a notable progressive commentator. Thoughts on restoring? –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Novem Linguae, is that a reliable source? She's a married woman, so WP:BLPGOSSIP applies. I'll elevate this to WP:BLP/N, but this has to stay out of the article for now. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- No need to escalate to BLPN, I think we can hash it out here. I forgot that she was married, useful context, that's a good reason to investigate a bit more before allowing it. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, just saw the edits over at Krystal Ball. Since so many editors are involved and since you extended confirmed protected it, yeah, BLPN is probably a good idea. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:39, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, just based on one edit here, it could be dealt with here. But this is a bigger BLP issue for Ball than it is for Kulinski. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu: You reverted edits which had secondary sources confirming the information and verified by another individual. Try reading the WP:BLPGOSSIP again. You only mentioned one secondary source at the WP:BLP/N and omitted this [1] regarding the marriage status. --NoMagicSpellstalk 06:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- NoMagicSpells, I'm confident of my reading of BLPGOSSIP.. You consider those sources to be up to our BLP standards? Distractify says they don't know anything about marital status. That is gossip. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu: You reverted edits which had secondary sources confirming the information and verified by another individual. Try reading the WP:BLPGOSSIP again. You only mentioned one secondary source at the WP:BLP/N and omitted this [1] regarding the marriage status. --NoMagicSpellstalk 06:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, just based on one edit here, it could be dealt with here. But this is a bigger BLP issue for Ball than it is for Kulinski. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Subscriber count edit
If you go to the editing page, you can see that his subscriber account is set to "1 million," so why does the Wikipedia article say "998,000"? PiratePablo (talk) 02:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 6 April 2023 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
https://www.youtube.com/@SecularTalk Kyle is now at one million subscribers on Youtube Thazair (talk) 10:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done for now. There is a bot on Wikidata that updates this weekly. It should be updated shortly. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:14, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Vaush is not connected to Kyle Kulinski in any notable way edit
@TheXuitts please stop adding him as an “associated act” of Kyle Kulinski without providing a secondary source for this claim. Mottezen (talk) 18:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Is this guy notable? edit
Does this guy meet notability requirements?
And at one point are editors obligated to correct erroneous information quoted by subjects of a biography? For example this notion that Kulinski is a political moderate in any country but the US because,
"the spectrum of public discourse has shifted to the far-right"
is total nonsense. Jonathan f1 (talk) 01:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- I removed this statement as it was violating WP:ABOUTSELF in my opinion. As for notability, I believe the sources present in the article show this person meets WP:GNG. Mottezen (talk) 03:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)