Talk:Kui (Chinese mythology)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Yak#Wild yaks|wild yak]] The anchor (#Wild yaks) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

About the components... edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't think that this character was a sum of components. I think that it was a pictophonetic character that has parts that coincidentally look like existing characters. TheGrassGuy (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charizardmewtwo (talk • contribs) Reply

Everyone's wrong sometime. — LlywelynII 05:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Splitsplitsplit edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We don't organize Wikipedia pages around the Chinese characters used to express them. There are at least 4 and possibly as many as a dozen separate meanings here, mixed uselessly together and badly described. Water buffalos aren't mythological creatures. Neither are drums. Split this into its component parts, particularly the legendary monster and the entirely unrelated supposed originator of music. — LlywelynII 05:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic