Talk:Kelly Richardson

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Freshacconci
  • Comment Under what basis has this article been flagged with POV? You've added a tag but not followed the wikipedia guidelines by stating what the issue is. See NPOV dispute "If you add this template to an article in which there is no relevant discussion underway, you need at least to leave a note on the article's talk page describing what you consider unacceptable about the article. The note should address the troubling passages, elements, or phrases specifically enough to encourage constructive discussion that leads to resolution." If you don't follow through with the above I see no reason for the POV and it will be removed. Carmex (talk) 16:24, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
    • I can't speak for the person who placed the tag, but statements like "Kelly Richardson is one of the leading representatives" are not NPOV, especially since it is cited by a link to an art gallery that exhibited or exhibits her work and is therefore not a third-party. The language used in the "Career" section does need to be rewritten to be made neutral. freshacconci talktalk 16:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
      • In fact, that whole first paragraph of the Career section is basically copypasted from the websites of two galleries representing her, so it's not only a copyright violation, it's not neutral or properly sourced. freshacconci talktalk 16:46, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply