WP:INDIA Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition edit

{{WP India}} with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 11:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gallery update edit

I have recent photographs of kanker Gauravdewangan (talk) 17:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 28 July 2016 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Kanker, Chhattisgarh. Which matches Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh etc.  — Amakuru (talk) 12:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


Kanker → ? – By the way it sounds, neither "Kanker" nor "Kanker district" can claim primary topic status - in fact the word "kanker" sounds a lot like "cancer". In fact the word means just that in the Dutch and Indonesian languages which explains the vandalism committed by two anonymous IPs from the Netherlands and Indonesia, respectively. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Verify accuracy of demographics edit

It doesn't look like the citations for the demographic numbers are valid. The links are dead, and one references a wayback machine snapshot from 2004 (a problematic citation for the 2011 census). I'd add the appropriate template, but don't know which one it would be. Bravemidwesterner (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Done copy edit edit

This is my first copy edit. From the best I Wikipedia's maintenance template structure, the problems with the article aren't really copy editing, but are more citations needed and information accuracy. Should that be changed? Bravemidwesterner (talk) 22:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply