Talk:Kailash Chandra Meher

[Untitled]

|importance=High |orissa=yes |orissa-importance=High}}

117.200.226.206 (talk) 19:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

This is a good article of my knowledge. I know Mr. Meher very well. The all data in this article are true & correct. It should be mark as High Class Article. 117.200.225.154 (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Please remove the maintenance templets from this article because the all data and information are true of my knowledge. Total write-up is correct. Aamarbhagwan (talk) 14:08, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

class="import-high " style="text-align:center; background: #ffacff; " |High 117.200.224.40 (talk) 17:43, 16 August 2013 (UTC) Anandratan (talk) 03:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Please remove the maintenance templates i.e.

Because every point of this article is correct. And I declare that the total information about Mr. Meher is true of my knowledge. This article is very important for project & it covers a general area of knowledge. It should be rated as B-Class Article. Pediamade (talk) 01:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Article of Mr. Kailash Chandra Meher should be rated as B class article. 117.200.233.129 (talk) 04:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

This beautiful article of Kailash Chandra Meher should be rated as B-Class article & also written/display in other languages like Hindi, Bengali, Tamil, Telugu etc. Because it covers a general area of knowledge. All data are true word by word. 117.201.144.156 (talk) 06:54, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Suggestions for Improvement

Kindly remove the maintenance templates from this article page, because all information & data is correct in my knowledge. It should be rated as B class article. This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge. It should be rated as High-importance article. Anandratan (talk) 04:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

It is a very good article. It should be rated as B-class article & also rated as High-importance article. This article fairly important to this project. So please remove the maintenance templates from this article page soon. 117.200.232.72 (talk) 05:01, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Remove the maintenance templates from this article page, because every word & documentation are 100% correct. I know about Mr. Kailash Chandra Meher very well through news papers, books, advertisements etc. So, It should be rated as GA or B-class article. Utkalabarta (talk) 13:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

What a awesome article of Mr. Meher. But why there is a maintenance templates situated at top of the article. Please remove it immediately. It covers a general area of knowledge and it should be rated as B class article. Supriyasodhi (talk) 12:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

This is a very important article and it covers a general area of knowledge. So it should be rated as GA-class article. Please remove the maintenance template immediately, because the all data & information written in page is absolutely correct. So there is no matter of "major contributor having close relation to this article". Solve this issue soon Sir. Robertpeza (talk) 11:52, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Please add more details in his career paragraph. 117.245.24.47 (talk) 04:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Discussion about User: Brainy J revision as of 17:26, 16 May 2013

Wikipedia contributor User:Kailash Chandra Meher and User:Prakash Kumar Meher are not connected/appear with the subject personally or not any close relatives. But those they contribute to this article are true of my knowledge and it covers a general area of knowledge. I check all data-information in this article which those users are contributed here with different websites, books, newspapers & also see in original. Finally I get to know that all information which are display at this article are 100% correct & true. You can get it from different sites like mention here:- So, please remove the COI tag from this main article page as soon as possible. Anandratan (talk) 18:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

I completely agree with User:Anandratan. I found the truth information from the given references that User:Kailash Chandra Meher and User:Prakash Kumar Meher are not appear a close connection with this article/subject. They are only a different person with same name & profession. But their contribution are true, line by line correct. Please check again from references mentioned in article page and retrieve. So, therefore I request you please remove the maintenance template from the article. Thank you. Durgapatiomm (talk) 18:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Aamarbhagwan (talk) 03:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

References

Remove the Maintenance Template from this article

I appreciate to User: Brainy J what had done in 16 May 2013 to this article. For that I trying to search the actual reason since that day. At last I came to know that both users namely User:Kailash Chandra Meher & User:Prakash Kumar Meher are totally new in Wikipedia, and they don't know the procedure to create an article or add data on article. Since May,2013 they have not made any contribution nor create any article till today. So, please forgive them and my request to Wikipedia that kindly try to understand the situation of article and take necessary action to remove the

template soon. And another point is that I survey about this article and founded some original paper documents which is clarified that all information displayed on article is correct, 100% true. I can show you when you want. Now this article rated as C-class article and Mid-importance article. It should not have an error or maintenance template. Aamarbhagwan (talk) 12:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Aamarbhagwan (talk) 03:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

It's a very good article of Mr. Kailash Chandra Meher. I saw some another sites about Mr. Meher & his background. Displaying data here are true, so please remove the maintenance template from this article. 121.245.235.72 (talk) 03:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi.. Can you tell me for which point in this biographical article you need additional citations for verification ? Please reply soon, then I will try to add reliable sources. Anandratan (talk) 02:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

I have repeatedly put maintenance templates up to show where they're missing, but you keep removing them. So instead of re-adding the tags, I've simply removed the unsourced claims. Ruby Murray 19:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Ruby Murray. If all balance is clear than why you put the (linkrot|date=January 2014)tag ? Anandratan (talk) 16:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Have you clicked on the links in the tag yet to read about what link rot is, and why bare URLs should be formatted? If anything's not clear to you after you've read the linked information, please post back here with questions. Ruby Murray 22:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Ruby Murray for removal of (linkrot|date=January 2014) tag from the article. I understand what you trying to told me, but I can't get the suitable URL in net regarding to Awards won by Mr. Meher. But I only have the copy of original award certificates. Anandratan (talk) 04:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

References

Sockpuppetry

Most of the above comments were posted by sockpuppets of a single editor: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prakash Kumar Meher. Ruby Murray 09:41, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

New references

I add the valuable resources (related links) for proof of awards. So, please remove the Maintenance Templates from Awards category list. Thanks Hariomm55a (talk) 12:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

All but two of the new references on awards appear to be from reliable sources, so I've removed the section template, thanks. Ruby Murray 14:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kailash Chandra Meher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131102142525/http://handicrafts.nic.in/awards/na2005.pdf to http://handicrafts.nic.in/awards/na2005.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 5 December 2017 (UTC)