Talk:KFUM-Kameratene Oslo Futsal

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Mentoz86 in topic Merge?

Merge? edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was Merge - 2 1/2 years after the discussion started, I'm merging these articles, as these two articles are so small that it isn't needed to split them. Mentoz86 (talk) 14:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

User:Geschichte has proposed to merge this article into it's parent club, KFUM-Kameratene Oslo, using the argument; "futsal is a tiny sport".

  1. Futsal is in fact the fastest-growing indoor sport in the world, and is played in all the continents of the world by over 100 countries with 12 million players.
  2. KFUM-Kameratene Oslo Futsal has won the Norwegian Futsal Premier League, and has also participated in the UEFA Futsal Cup.
  3. The club has also gained broad coverage by media: Dagbladet.no, TV2Sporten.no, Fotball.no and UEFA.com.

So how KFUM's futsal department is less notable than the parent club, I cannot figure out. So instead of wasting yours and my time, please try to continue your good work here at Wikipedia, and rather expand the article. =) Best regards, lil2mas (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • I'd rather expand the article KFUM-Kameratene Oslo with the content here, and I can also add athletics. Geschichte (talk) 11:48, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • I understand your view, but with multi-sport clubs I think its better to separate the club's elite teams in their own articles, and mention the club's minor sports in the main article. With elite teams I mean teams who have played in the top league of their sport; Basket: BLNO, Football: Tippeligaen, Futsal: Telekiosken Futsal Liga, Handball: Postenligaen, Ice hockey: GET-ligaen, etc. lil2mas (talk) 12:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Several of these, especially the handball leagues and women's basketball, do not strike me as very elite, especially if we go back just 10-15 years. I think that content should be the grounds for a split. We shouldn't split a six-sentence article into two three-sentence articles. Geschichte (talk) 16:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Also this constitutes a "bias" for league sports; at least different guidelines. Geschichte (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.