Talk:John Singleton Copley

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Birth date and place edit

1737 or 1738? Any reliable source out there??? User:Ejrrjs says What? 22:31, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

He's listed on the Boston Irish Heritage Trail. According to them, he was born in Boston on July 3, 1737. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by MopTop (talkcontribs) 16:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Head of a Man portrait edit

Can we add "Head of a Man" That's probably his best one. All that other commissioned stuff was for money. TriniTriggs 01:39, 12 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

added Head of a Man to the article gallery - Epousesquecido (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

[untitled] edit

So works commissioned for money aren't artistically valid? There goes the Renaissance. (VENICEMENACE) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.20.56.29 (talk) 01:47, 5 May 2006‎ (UTC)Reply

Copley wasn't an American! edit

If he was born to Irish parents in a time when America as a country didn't exist and if he went to live in London before the American declaration of independence, then how can he still be an American??? The nationaity should be changed to Irish or British. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.183.11.165 (talk) 21:31, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The article doesn't claim that he held United States citizenship. However, being born in North America and having spent a large portion of his life there certainly lends appropriateness to the adjective "American." 71.219.205.24 (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Gallery Guidelines edit

Re: Deletion of Copley images under heading "other works". Are there wiki guidelines for how many images should be in a gallery for an artist? if there is a limit, are their guidelines for inclusion.--Hantsheroes (talk) 16:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

I suppose WP:IG gives a general idea. In my experience, galleries should be concise and relevant. Copley executed around 200 paintings and sketches; naturally, the gallery should only include a small fraction, with the rest kept on Commons. Precisely which should be in the gallery is, of course, open to debate. I'd say the gallery should include the better-known ones, which is a little subjective, given there's no handy source listing his major works. (At least none that is at hand for me.) Most of those in the gallery at present probably fall into the category. Michael and Susannah Francklin likely do not, but feel free to persuade us otherwise. - Biruitorul Talk 16:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
That's helpful clarification. Makes sense.--Hantsheroes (talk) 16:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Singleton Copley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Loyalist? edit

He has been added to Category:Loyalists in the American Revolution. However, the article says nothing about his position on the American Revolution. Some information on this topic would be an interesting addition, and is needed to back up the categorization. 71.219.205.24 (talk) 13:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Singleton Copley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply