Talk:Jennifer Brunner

Neutrality

I had brought up the issue of neutrality a few weeks ago, and had failed to elaborate. A few points:

• The article tends to read like it's trying to tell the story of Brunner, rather than just give the facts. The article tends to read somewhat like campaign literature or a magazine feature.
• "Secretary of State accomplishments" isn't really appropriate as a section heading.
• Tying back to the first point, quite a few bits of the article seem like they're written to garner sympathy for Brunner and her positions. There's probably more text in the article aimed to providing a sympathetic context for Brunner's actions than there actually is text describing the actions themselves.

--NeuronExMachina (talk) 20:50, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jennifer Brunner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of December 27, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: pass

2. Factually accurate?: pass

3. Broad in coverage?: fail - majority of article about political accomplishments. Should add mre about personal life

4. Neutral point of view?: fail - review above this section was somewhat accepted, but some neglection spotted. Sections where NPOV not met:

• Intro, second paragraph
• 1.1, last paragraph
• Section 1, 2-4th paragraphs

5. Article stability? pass

6. Images?: pass

The review on Neutrality above this section is really to the point. Use it!

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Leujohn ^(talk) 05:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jennifer Brunner/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi Tony! Sorry it's taken me so long to get to the article - things have been a bit hectic in RL... Anyways, I'll try to get to at least everything but the prose tonight, and hopefully through the rest of the review by tomorrow afternoon. Dana boomer (talk) 03:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • In the Private practice section, the information on her work with the Ohio Pesticide Applicators for Responsible Regulation is repeated in the first paragraph and the third paragraph, with the exact same wording used in both instances.

   • I must have copied and pasted instead of cut and pasted.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

   • Private practice, third paragraph, "but that was allegedly disproportionately by the Ohio Democratic Party." does not make sense.

   • Got this one too. I forgot to update here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

   • Private practice, next to last paragraph "whose published election-related literature challenged" doesn't make sense.

   • was challenged.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   • Ref 158 (Majors, Stephen) is dead.

   • Swapped ref.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

   • Ref 162 (Smyh, Julie Carr) is dead.

   • Removed.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 22:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I've completed reviews for references, images and stability. I'll complete my review tomorrow, as it's getting a bit late in my part of the world. Dana boomer (talk) 05:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

   I've completed my entire review, finding just a few prose issues in addition to the two dead linking references I pointed out last night. I find no evidence of the POV issues addressed in the prior review and the GAR. I am placing the review on hold to allow time to deal with the few issues detailed above. Dana boomer (talk) 19:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

   Allright, everything looks good, so I'm passing the article to GA status. Nice work. Dana boomer (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Neutrality 2

A blog, Aude Sapere, written by Stephen Hopkins, has raised concerns about the neutrality of the article. Some of his concerns are valid, despite his asserting that the article is being deliberately written with bias by Brunner's campaign. I've tried to allay his concerns about the authorship of the article, and to educate him about the Wiki process, but I've had little success. I think the article's coverage of its subject could be improved by the inclusion of more significant criticisms and other negative information in order to balance out the perceived pro-Brunner tone of the article. I reiterate that there's no reason to believe that anything deliberate has been done to favor Brunner. It's simply that I could see where further improvement could be made. --SSBohio 07:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Jennifer Brunner.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Jennifer Brunner.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Jennifer Brunner.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:22, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

2014 judicial election

It's been a long time since I've contributed to Wikipedia. I added a small blurb in the introduction about Jennifer's 2014 run for the Ohio Tenth District Court of Appeals. If the sources I've cited aren't good sources, or if I did anything incorrectly, please let me know! --Dylan Henrich (talk) 14:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Jennifer Brunner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081120131613/http://www.jenniferbrunner.com/view/news/121 to http://www.jenniferbrunner.com/view/news/121
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081005090440/http://elections.foxnews.com:80/2008/08/14/new-ohio-voter-registration-rules-irk-gop/ to http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/14/new-ohio-voter-registration-rules-irk-gop/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081003025728/http://blogs.usatoday.com:80/ondeadline/2008/09/us-appeals-cour.html to http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2008/09/us-appeals-cour.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081207182526/http://www.politickeroh.com:80/justinmiller/stivers-supporters-win-supreme-court-case to http://www.politickeroh.com/justinmiller/stivers-supporters-win-supreme-court-case

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:02, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jennifer Brunner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090325063935/http://www.lawyerscomm.org/2005website/home/pictures0721/lccrulvotingrights-9.30.2008.pdf to http://www.lawyerscomm.org/2005website/home/pictures0721/lccrulvotingrights-9.30.2008.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Jennifer Brunner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110523054839/http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2009/02/17/Brunner_Senate.html?sid=101 to http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2009/02/17/Brunner_Senate.html?sid=101
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120714071742/http://oh.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CFDCT%5CSOH%5C2008%5C20081029_0001504.SOH.htm/qx to http://oh.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CFDCT%5CSOH%5C2008%5C20081029_0001504.SOH.htm/qx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100209115453/http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2008/10/28/ajudgerule.html?sid=101 to http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2008/10/28/ajudgerule.html?sid=101
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120904141152/http://www.necn.com/Boston/New-England/Jennifer-Brunner-receives-Profile-in-Courage-Award-/1210607853.html to http://www.necn.com/Boston/New-England/Jennifer-Brunner-receives-Profile-in-Courage-Award-/1210607853.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2010/08/15/copy/local-ballot-issues-often-clear-as-mud.html?sid=101%2F

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jennifer Brunner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081009063045/http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/elections/electResultsMain/2002Results/common.aspx to http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/elections/electResultsMain/2002Results/common.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:23, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Lead

The lead paragraphs of this article are much too long, inconsistent with WP:LEAD guidelines. The lead should briefly summarize the article, but here it is more like a complete reiteration of the article itself. Interested editors are encouraged to review the lead and narrow its focus to be more consistent with Wikipedia formatting. Go4thProsper (talk) 02:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)