Talk:Jaz Brisack
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from Jaz Brisack appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 March 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 17:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Jaz Brisack, who led Starbucks Workers United in unionizing, was the first woman Rhodes Scholar at the University of Mississippi? Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/02/12/rhodes-scholar-barista-fight-unionize-starbucks/
5x expanded by SquareInARoundHole (talk). Self-nominated at 19:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC).
- I will review. The article is long enough, certainly well-referenced and the hook is supported with an appropriate inline citation, so looks good so far. MartinPoulter (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC) The article is written in an appropriately encyclopaedic way with proper sourcing for a living person, it was nominated in time and it's original, with quoted material marked appropriately. It seems like this is your first DYK so no QPQ necessary. The hook is short enough, properly formatted, and highlights an interesting and distinctive fact about this person. There were a few minor stylistic things that I've fixed myself. This is a clear pass: thanks for improving the coverage of women and of organised labour on Wikipedia. MartinPoulter (talk) 11:15, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
The subject of this biography uses, and should be referred to with, the pronouns they/them (source). Please do not change these pronouns without a consensus on the talk page. For more information, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography § Gender identity. |