Talk:Japan Restoration Party
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Japan Restoration Party article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Political Definition Problem edit
First of all I want to add a note to the post below me. It is always problematic with "left, right" definitions. I don't like them. Traditionally Leftism is anti-authoritarian and rightism authoritarian but sadly it has come to encompass way to many issues. Still I think that based on various sources this party could be considered far right.
One thing I can't find any sources for is neo-liberal. What makes a party that wants more nationalism, more moralism in business, more taxes neo-liberal? The party seems to steer more towards some form of japanese traditionalist capitalism.
Please show sources for Neo Liberalism and the other definitions. Pleasse if possible translate the party program so I can read it to. 213.100.108.117 (talk) 20:42, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Far right? edit
According to an article in the Guardian, the party leans to the far right.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/16/japanese-voters-go-to-polls?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487
So for now I'lll add that to the article, but if someone else could find more sources to support that assertion i'd be appreciated.Onthehook (talk) 17:34, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of Place? edit
The sentence "Hashimoto stated that wartime sex slaves are 'necessary'." in the intro seems out of place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.167.238.147 (talk) 09:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Japan Restoration Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140613141150/http://ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/politics/AJ201405290037 to http://ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/politics/AJ201405290037
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140613141150/http://ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/politics/AJ201405290037 to http://ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/politics/AJ201405290037
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)