Talk:Italian Somaliland

Untitled edit

Between 1890 - 1908 the Italian faced fierce resistance from Southern Somali clans. The Dir Bimaal and Hawiye Wacdan ambushed Antonio Cecchi's party in Lafoole killing 19 Italians and hundred of native and Arab ascaris. The Bimaal spearheaded the longest resistance between 1890 - 1908. The militant Bimaal opposed Italian penetration of the hinterland of Banadir coast with the help of only their brethern the Wacdan clan. Later Sheikh Hassan Barsan, a Galjecel, whose worriors were mostly Jiido and Bimaal continued when the Bimaal were defeated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.151.7.55 (talk) 01:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Italian Somaliland. edit

The Italian colonization of Somalia began in 1889 (Vincenzo Filonardi). The Colony of Italian Somaliland was established on April 5, 1908.

The most important battle in Somalia during WWII. edit

The decisive battle in Italian Somaliland during WWWII took place on Gelib (Juba River) on February 22-24, 1941. The British defeated the Italians and took Mogadishu on February 27.

Somalia or Somaliland? edit

On the coins and banknotes of this colony, the name given is Somalia Italiana, which surely translates as Italian Somalia, not Somaliland. Anyone got contradictory evidence?
Dove1950 21:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

As stated above, Somaliland is an error, so I'll rename it Italian Somalia. I really wonder how this name came out.--Aldux 20:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

British Somaliland and Italian Somaliland was united before the colonial arrived, so they both shared the name Somaliland. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.182.201 (talk) 16:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

They did not share the name "Somaliland". It simply did not exist! And all the maps in english language show always "Italian Somalia" and "British Somaliland". The right name of the article must be Italian Somalia. F.T.B. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.86.226.11 (talk) 03:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The autonomous Somaliland region of modern-day Somalia obviously did not exist back then, Dulio, but Italian Somaliland most certainly did (as did the British Somaliland it united with to form the Somali Republic). And that is the most common name for the territory, not "Italian Somalia". Middayexpress (talk) 08:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Exceptional claims require exceptional sources edit

Again, please familiarize with Wikipedia's policy regarding non-English sources on English Wikipedia (i.e. this site):

Because this is the English Wikipedia, for the convenience of our readers, editors should use English-language sources in preference to sources in other languages, assuming the availability of an English-language source of equal quality, so that readers can easily verify that the source material has been used correctly. Where editors use a non-English source to support material that others are likely to challenge, or translate any direct quote, they need to quote the relevant portion of the original text in a footnote or in the article, so readers can check that it agrees with the article content. Translations published by reliable sources are preferred over translations made by Wikipedia editors.

Your http://www.italosomali.org source falls short in several respects because:
1)It's not in English and this, again, is English Wikipedia. Since your source is not in English, readers can't "easily verify that the source material has been used correctly".
2)You personally translated the text instead of providing a translation published by a reliable source.
3)Your assertion here that "the Italians brought to Somalia a huge development of Catholicism embraced by nearly 20% of the population in the 1940s" also more than qualifies as an exceptional claim per Wiki policies since all the available mainstream historical sources on the Somalis agree that they are and have always been among the most singularly Muslim populations extant. Your edit therefore necessitates a high quality source, which the Italian-language http://www.italosomali.org/ unfortunately does not qualify as:

Certain red flags should prompt editors to examine the sources for a given claim:

  • surprising or apparently important claims not covered by mainstream sources;
  • reports of a statement by someone that seems out of character, embarrassing, controversial, or against an interest they had previously defended;
  • claims that are contradicted by the prevailing view within the relevant community, or which would significantly alter mainstream assumptions, especially in science, medicine, history, politics, and biographies of living persons. This is especially true when proponents consider that there is a conspiracy to silence them.

Exceptional claims in Wikipedia require high-quality reliable sources; if such sources are not available, the material should not be included. Also be sure to adhere to other policies, such as the policy for biographies of living persons and the undue weight provision of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

I have therefore reverted your edit. Causteau (talk) 02:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Sultan Yusuf Ali Kenadid.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Sultan Yusuf Ali Kenadid.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Italian Somaliland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:06, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply