Talk:Isabel Lucas

H&A episode total

There's no way she was just in 59 episodes? Can this be double-checked? It should be multiples of that number. She was in the series for years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.46.200.76 (talk) 17:56, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Isabel Lucas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120314192815/http://www.nbcf.org.au/content/upload/files/resources/2004-2005.pdf to http://www.nbcf.org.au/content/upload/files/resources/2004-2005.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090102011847/http://www.worldvision.com.au:80/media/ambassador.asp?id=5 to http://www.worldvision.com.au/media/ambassador.asp?id=5
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090325224717/http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/CA256F310024B628/0/48999FB39FF74B14CA2570E60009FA68/$File/M2030+bulletin+Spring+2005.pdf to http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/CA256F310024B628/0/48999FB39FF74B14CA2570E60009FA68/$File/M2030+bulletin+Spring+2005.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150601025525/http://www.savethewhalesagain.com/japanese_boycott.html to http://www.savethewhalesagain.com/japanese_boycott.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Isabel Lucas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://isabellucasinspired.org/press/news.php?newsid=28
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090831235503/http://men.style.com/details/features/landing?id=content_9357 to http://men.style.com/details/features/landing?id=content_9357
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080114173910/http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=334504 to http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=334504
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120129053552/http://www.seashepherd.org/australia/isabel-lucas-psa.html to http://www.seashepherd.org/australia/isabel-lucas-psa.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Isabel Lucas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321034549/http://www.petaasiapacific.com/featureSexiestVegCeleb2010-Eng.asp to http://www.petaasiapacific.com/featureSexiestVegCeleb2010-Eng.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Regular editors

Please check the odd "Bibliography:Contributors" section and subsection, which contains a single entry formatted as a citation to a work authored by the title subject. If the work is consulted, it should appear as a reference. If it is a part of her corpus of written work, then the section is mis-titled and the work is mis-presented. I would suggest incorporating this into a standard WP article structure, rather than confusing the reader with this novelty.

Finally, The article appears to be "fanzine" in emphasis, and almost entirely laudatory, and so the article scope and sourcing are to a degree suspect. I would pick several end of paragraph and end of sentence citations, and see if all content in the apparently supported unit of text is indeed supported. I have repeatedly found in this type of article that the articles drift toward non-encyclopedic, as content is added without source, often via insertion so as to maintain the appearance that all is well. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:C700:7DAE:D528:67FF:4B7D:B3FE (talk) 06:16, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Ye, I don't exactly what the Bibliography section is for or why it is there, more experienced editors please advise. _TheKuygerian^contribs
_userpage 16:52, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Evidence for anti-vaccine activism

Whilst there is immediate evidence of her being against 5G rollout by way of her Instagram, there doesn't seem to be any evidence that she's explicitly anti-vaccine nor an activist of such measures. The only "evidence" is the headline by Who Magazine themselves. The intro needs to be revised or compounded with evidence if this is the case. Whilst anti 5G/anti vax circles overlap, they should still be considered distinct.

ItsBozzie (talk) 12:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Actually, not just the headline. The article itself says it. What would you accept as evidence? If you say "a statement by herself", then you should read WP:SOURCE and WP:PRIMARY, and you will find that your preferences are vastly different from those of Wikipedia. --Hob Gadling (talk) 15:35, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

I have removed the categories as non-defining per WP:COPDEF and WP:OPINIONCAT. This person's primary notability stems from being is an actress and model. Holding beliefs (be they vegetarianism or anti-vaccine stances), or even speaking them aloud does not immediately make one an activist, especially for the sake of categorization that should be based on defining characteristics, not crusades to save the world by naming and shaming everyone who has publicly opposed a vaccine or mentioned 5G or Flat Earth or the Bermuda Triangle in some form or another. Per WP:COPDEF, "not everything a celebrity does after becoming famous warrants categorization." --Animalparty! (talk) 03:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)