Talk:Irvine Company

Secondary sources (to demonstrate notability)

Postsuburban California: The Transformation of Orange County since World War II (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), includes a chapter by Martin J. Schiesl titled "Designing the Model Community: The Irvine Company and Suburban Development, 1950-88."

Monopoly on Rental Properties

The Irvine company has a monopoly-hold on the rental properties in Irvine and much of the rest of Tustin and Newport Beach. As a result, it is impossible to find affordable rental housing in the City of Irvine. What's more, residents are faced with across-the-board rate increases each year above the actual value of housing in the area. Residents cannot find relief through competition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.70.65 (talk • contribs)

This also extends greatly to commerical retail properties. Although this hold is lessening as the former Tustin and El Toro MCAS redevelopment programs have basically excluded Irvine Company development. All development is by other developers this includes retail, residential and residential apartments.

-> 5 years ago this was true, however there are MANY commercial properties and now apartment units NOT in the Irvine Company sphere of influence. This includes multiple projects along Jamboree Blvd and former Tustin MCAS located residential and commercial. Irvine Company has NO say or influence on any of those projects. There are also shopping centers in Irvine (Culver/Walnut where the Ralphs is located) that are *NOT* Irvine Company owned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.4.228.58 (talk) 09:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Father and Son

The article has links to James Irvine I (who bought the ranch), and to his son, James Irvine II (who incorporated the company). The link to the son was red, and that to the father pointed to James Irvine (landowner). However, that article is about the son. I've switched it so that the father link now goes to the James Irvine disambiguation page, and the son link goes to the correct article. Rojomoke (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irvine Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120511001143/http://www.ci.irvine.ca.us/cityhall/cs/openspace/bommer_canyon.asp to http://www.ci.irvine.ca.us/cityhall/cs/openspace/bommer_canyon.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Toxic apartment?

This was just published https://sfbayview.com/2021/03/i-thought-i-was-dying-my-apartment-was-built-on-toxic-waste/ Victor Grigas (talk) 13:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)