Talk:Ill Manors

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British crime (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British crime, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime articles

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Correct capitalisation of Ill Manors edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I have seen several variations of the capitalisation of Ill Manors, (such as ill Manors, ill MANORS, iLL Manors and ILL Manors) so I would like to open a discussion on which is the correct capitalisation. Based on the Wikipedia Manual of Style, I think there are two possibilities:

"Ill Manors" where the initial letters of both words are in upper case and all other letters in lower-case. (see Manual of Style for composition titles)
"ill Manors" where the initial letter of the first word is in lower case. (see Manual of Style for items that require initial lower case)

I think the best choice would be "Ill Manors" as this follows standard English conventions and according to the Wikipedia Manual of Style, the first and last words in composition titles (such as books, films, albums and song titles) should begin with an upper-case letter. Personally, I see no worthwhile reason why "ill Manors" should be used. I know it is written that way on digital stores but "Ill Manors" is a song title and not a trademark such as eBay, iPod etc. Please discuss which capitalisation of "Ill Manors" you think should be used. Ellm6 (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Agree with the above; I don't think it meets the criteria for an initial lower-case letter. Suggest going with the first option, possibly starting off the lead section with something like “Ill Manors (often sylised as iLL Manors or ill Manors) is an…” — cBuckley (Talk • Contribs) 23:04, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've corrected the capitalisation from "ill Manors"/"iLL Manors" to the conventional "Ill Manors" on this article and "Ill Manors (song)" - Ellm6 (talk) 22:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Use of Lottery Money edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The National Lottery has correctly been called a 'tax on the stupid', and this was made evident from the very beginning when funds which were supposed to benefit good causes first went instead to buying letters from a British political family and to renovating the Royal Opera House; clearly elitist causes which benefited nobody but the rich and powerful. This film represents misuse of lottery money at the other end of the spectrum. Of what possible use is it to glorify this band of obnoxious criminals who are clearly held back and kept down by their own 'respect culture'? The existence of the film can serve only to romanticize this depraved way of life and thus spread it to as-yet unpolluted regions. This film should be cited by objectors when Camelot next applies for its license to be renewed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.197.116 (talk) 02:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ill Manors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic