Talk:Hyakka Ryōran

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Coverage edit

Note: Use the original Japanese link for in-line citation purpose. --KrebMarkt (talk) 21:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Review(s) edit

--KrebMarkt (talk) 19:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Raw data edit

Characters edit

Main edit

Sasuke (佐助)

Student Council Officials edit

Takamori Matsudaira (松平 尊保, Matsudaira Takamori)

Toyotomi Faction edit

Katsunaga Mori (毛利 勝永, Mōri Katsunaga)
Motochika Chosokabe (長曽我部 元親, Chōsokabe Motochika)
Takenori Akashi (明石 全登, Akashi Takenori)

Other edit

Shiro Amakusa (天草 四郎 時貞, Amakusa Shirō Takisada)
Shosetsu Yui (由比 正雪, Yui Shōsetsu)
Musashi Miyamoto (宮本 武蔵, Miyamoto Musashi)
Kojiro Sasaki (佐々木 小次郎, Sasaki Kojirō)
Mataemon Araki (荒木 又右衛門, Araki Mataemon)
Injun Hozoin (宝蔵院 胤舜, Hōzōin Injun)

Should harem be added to the genre list? edit

Should harem be added to the list of genres? In the anime it appears that Jūbei, Yukimura, Sen, and Gisen have feelings for Muneakira. What do you guys think? K2NR (talk) 20:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Are there any reliable sources, form either the publisher or a number of reviewers classifying the series as a harem? —Farix (t | c) 22:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
The anime appears to speak for itself when it comes to that genre. So does the anime itself count as a source or not? K2NR (talk) 00:34, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Also, check out the Mania.com reviews above. To me it counts as a reliable source. I'm not sure if it counts for you though, Farix K2NR (talk) 01:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
"a number of reviewers classifying the series as a harem". You will need more than just one, but a consensus of the reviewers. And no, the work itself cannot be a source for most genres, as determining genres requires interpretation. —Farix (t | c) 15:23, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
So if the series isn't technically classified as harem, what other genres (other than action and comedy because it's already been listed) should be added to the article? K2NR (talk) 20:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Use the genres that the publisher, retailers, and reliable sources determine it to be. —Farix (t | c) 20:52, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Well, according to Japan's Wikipedia article, it is listed as a romantic comedy. So the comedy genre should be changed to that, I believe. K2NR (talk) 02:43, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
The Japanese Wikipedia isn't a reliable source either. —Farix (t | c) 11:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Oh well. Guess I'll close this topic for now, until someone else finds some evidence for the genres. K2NR (talk) 21:00, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

What's with all the Pseudonyms? edit

Why do all the English cast members have punny names for their cast credit here? Should they be changed to their real names? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.145.88.147 (talk) 05:58, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Move nomination edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 08:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply



Hyakka Ryōran Samurai GirlsHyakka Ryōran – "Samurai Girls" is only the subtitle of the light novel series, the second manga series, and the first anime series. It is not the only subtitle of the franchise. "Sengoku Maidens" appears instead of SG in the first manga, "Seven Spears" in place of SG in the third manga, and "Samurai Bride" appears in place of SG in the second anime. Shortening the title will be more inclusive of the franchise and also avoid disputes on how to stylize the separation between the two titles. For example, how we have a space between them in the article URL yet use a colon between them in the first sentence. Ranze (talk) 19:54, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hyakka Ryōran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply