Talk:History of Cincinnati

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2601:1C2:4E00:2100:9C0:AAC6:5282:FF15 in topic "To Do" list

"To Do" list edit

Okay Cincinnati people, how about a to-do list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SiDNEy (talkcontribs) 21:55, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

To do, well for starters we should have at least some mention of the Native American's who inhabited the land where Cincinnati is now situated (such as the Shawnee, Adena, etc), we just totally skip over them in this article and in this main Cincinnati article. I'll see what references I can round-up and then try to edit something into the article but I am by no means a historian (although I did take the U.S. History tract of classes in college) and wish someone who is more astute in this topic would run with it. Anyway, to not even mention these people, whose evidence is still visible in the area (earthworks, mounds, some current roads, such as Ridge Road, that were old "Indian Trails" -which apparently provided a substantial part of the initial infrastructure of land-travel in the Cincinnati, etc), would be a dishonor at the very least. --Paulsprecker (talk) 13:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
More info on the civil war era, particularly Cincinnati being placed under marshall law due to the threat of Morgan's Raiders and the Southern sympathies in the area evidenced by the Copperheads (politics) movement would be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.0.128 (talkcontribs) 23:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Another contributor: German settlement of early Cincinn would be appropriate, especially how it affected its urban footprint

The Union's activities such as the Ohio River blockade, and the roundup and diversion of escaping Blacks before and after the Civil War is an important item to include here (Sergeant's business, where Union non-commissioned officers stationed along the river would capture escaping slaves and exchange them with Southern Non-comms for Confederate bounties. Hey I like this ToDo grabbag thing.-Northern Ohioan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C2:4E00:2100:9C0:AAC6:5282:FF15 (talk) 18:34, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of "Race relations of Cincinnati" into this article edit

I am proposing that Race relations of Cincinnati be merged into this article. That article is fairly short and is more of an essay than an encyclopedic article, as it seems to make a lot of arguments and not cite many sources. It would take a lot of work to revise the article into something more encyclopedic, and the article barely meets WP:N. It seems like it would be both more efficient and worthwhile to instead just rewrite the content of that article in a section in this article. -Oxguy3 tc 22:04, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good to me! Nate Wessel (talk) 19:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
I agree with the merger. The topic is notable, but the existing article is very incomplete. It'd be better to merge it back in for now, and split it again if it ever becomes unwieldy. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:8DC4:BB80:568F:2021 (talk) 04:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Timeline of Cincinnati edit

What is missing from the city timeline? Please add relevant content. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 12:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Cincinnati. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply