Talk:Hans Bohrdt

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at California Maritime Academy supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review

1. This article does not have 500 words per person. Good do see there is a lead paragraph there. Only have 4 sections of content and need 1 more. Citation error needs to be fixed and there are no images included.

2. No references shown on page

3. The article flows presents factual information.

Asingh247 (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)A.J Singh

Peer Review

◦500 words per person: not enough words

◦Lead Paragraph: good lead paragraph

◦4 Sections of content: not enough contents

◦Minimum ammount of citations: no citations

◦Images: no images avaliable

◦Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority? insufficient authority

◦Are the sources listed in the References of accurate? not accurate

◦Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles? some worth while articles, but missing more

◦Is the information being presented factual in nature? not sure

◦Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias) not yet, missing more information.

◦Does the article flow effectively? it goes along very well

◦Does the article feeling like it is missing content? the article needs more contents. Brazil2014 (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review

Completeness:

   500 words per person: No
   Lead Paragraph: No
   4 Sections of content:No
   Minimum ammount of citations:No
   Images:No

Evaluation of Resources:

   Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority?No
   Are the sources listed in the References of accurate?No
   Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles?No

Readability & Content:

   Is the information being presented factual in nature?Yes 
   Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias)Yes
   Does the article flow effectively? Yes
   Does the article feeling like it is missing content? A little

This one needs some work, looks like you need to finish with the writing you are short on words, you have some errors in the ref list that Mr Bolin can probably help you out on. But you have some internal links which helps out with getting it done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diesels9000 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Diesels9000 (talk) 15:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review

Information doesn't flow nicely; it feels choppy and inconsistent. The authors did not write 1000 words, and is missing several formatting requirements from the assignment. Missing sources and citations.Cowbell3000 (talk) 15:08, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Peer Reveiw

◦500 words per person:Does seem to have the right amount of words.

◦Lead Paragraph:Nice Opening

◦4 Sections of content:No only had three

◦Minimum ammount of citations:Not enough sources yet. ◦Images:NO images in the wiki yet.

◦Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority? I think the info came from a good place. But the sources have to be cited.

◦Are the sources listed in the References of accurate?No sources

◦Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles? I think the info was worth while.

◦Is the information being presented factual in nature?Yes i believe so, they did a good job. ◦Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias)I think it is. They wouldnt have a reason not to presesnt it like that.

◦Does the article flow effectively?Yes, but could use a little more.

◦Does the article feeling like it is missing content?Yes — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinB359 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review

Does not have 500 words per person. Has citations but no list. The information seems to be factual and up to date. Needs some pictures.It seems like you guys did get some god articles and searched really hard. also need a lead paragraph. Vcarveratcma (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

fascinating...

to compare this long article with the rather short one in the German wikipedia.

One small suggestion:

In the first paragraph you say

In 1915 Bohrdt created his most famous illustration which is called "The Last Man".[1] The image shows a German navy officer holding up a German flag as his ship sinks because he would rather go down with the ship than surrender.  

That man is definitely not an officer, he is an enlisted sailor. I guess the intended propaganda effect would have been lost if you had an officer with gold stripes on his uniform there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.136.17.147 (talk) 10:36, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

- oh and "Altersheim" is not a place-name, it means "Old peoples' home". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.136.17.147 (talk) 10:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)