This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject College BasketballTemplate:WikiProject College Basketballcollege basketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
The refimprove tag has been on this article for an embarrassingly long 6+ years now. Recently, I cleared the uncited content from this article for the reason that it is unverifiable. It's not my job to find sources for whatever other people post, it is the poster's job to cite or accept that their content can be removed at any time unless they add reliable sources to support their additions. Markvs88 (talk) 01:36, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply Addendum: without two third party sources this page will eventually become a candidate for deletion. Markvs88 (talk) 12:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
A source is a source. The map came from the conference website, but you wouldn’t know because you’re too damn lazy to look. I’ll work on outside sources, but maybe you should help too. You should be here to improve Wikipedia, not destroy it. Corky 15:36, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
No, a source needs to be reputable, and the one you're referring to is an unattributable map on a webpage. If anything, it is woefully insufficient to establish notability. As for being lazy, again, that's not my job as I'm not the fanboy adding unattributable cruft. Yes, please do. You seem a bit confused... deleting unsourced content does not destroy anything. It is following best practices. Suppose I added uncited text to the article that stated "this league is known to be the weakest in its geographical region". Would you want that to stand for six years? I don't think so. Markvs88 (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Seems like common sense is being lost in the name of "best practices". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Splinter 9 (talk • contribs) 06:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
