This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion
I made changes to the article with a reliable source. Grantism was defined by U.S. Senator Charles Sumner in 1872. Throughout the years it has had evolving definitions. {Cmguy777 (talk) 20:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)}Reply
In the current revision, there's only one definition given Tedickey (talk) 20:27, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
That is true. Since Sumner created the term it is best to define "Grantism" as he defined the word. Further investigation should be done to find more definitions on Grantism.{Cmguy777 (talk) 21:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)}Reply
In the current revision, the text is all one chunk (3 paragraphs). It would help to have a short (one-sentence) lede, then mark a section for origins, then another for subsequent meanings, etc. Tedickey (talk) 21:30, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
I made the changes. How does the article look now? Are any more changes in order? {Cmguy777 (talk) 22:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)}Reply
"tenacious" is probably redundant, unless there's a source which points this out in particular Tedickey (talk) 22:34, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
I took out "tenacious". The article looks good. {Cmguy777 (talk) 22:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)}Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I added a new section to the article on Grant as a reformer. The section is incomplete. However, I believe this adds balance to the article and alleviates POV against Grant. Cmguy777 (talk) 06:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Added more information using McFeely-Woodward (1974) as references. Cmguy777 (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I don't understand this sentence:
"It [the term 'Grantism'] was made to create a distinction between what Sumner believed between the Republican Party and Ulysses S. Grant."
I guess it's the double 'between' that's throwing me. Do we mean to say 'Grantism' created a distinction between (a) what Sumner believed the Republican Party to be (and/or represented, i.e. his own beliefs) and (b) the party under Grant? Would love Cmguy777 to rewrite. Woodshed (talk) 01:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
