| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Bibliography edit
That's a good bibliography of 2000AD work, but what about outside 2000AD? There's White Trash and a STarship Troopers spin-off at the very least. --Artw 00:06, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Go for it! :p Vizjim 19:20, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
Does describing Martin Emond as "talented" violate NPOV policy? edit
It seems to me that it would be a value judgement.--Nick xylas 19:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Makes sense - feel free to remove it. (Emperor 21:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC))
"a grumpy Scottish git" edit
While possibly true, do we have a source for this? If he hasn't said that then it should be removed asap. (Emperor (talk) 19:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC))
Uncited or dead edit
Vast portions of the Gordon Rennie#Biography section do not have a citation, similar to the comment above. Most of the remainder relies on a single dead citation of a 14-year-old article (as of this comment) in the Sunday Mail of Scotland. Jmg38 (talk) 04:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)