Talk:Gliese 229

Copyright problem

In this revision, material which appears to have been copied directly from the SolStation website was inserted into the article. Since SolStation is copyrighted, I have reverted the article to the state it was in before this copyrighted material was added, per WP:CP. Icalanise (talk) 13:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Factual innacuracy?

This article states that Gliese 229B is too small to sustain fusion at a mass between 20 to 50 Jupiter masses. Deuterium fusion is sustained at 13 Jupiter masses. See the brown dwarf article. Ittiz (talk) 07:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

You are quite correct. The original author probably meant hydrogen fusion, and so I modified the text accordingly.—RJH (talk) 20:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gliese 229. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041031004701/http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/shadow/questions/brown_dwarf.html to http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/shadow/questions/brown_dwarf.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)