Talk:Give Your Heart a Break

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

File:Give Your Heart A Break.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Give Your Heart A Break.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wow! edit

Wow! This is a very well made article! I love it! ;D ★♛iluvselenagomez1234♛★ (talk) 03:35, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Really? electropop edit

No way in hell is this song electropop, or dance or rock in anyway...the only valid genres the should be put in the infobox should be dance considering its the only one with a reference, theres nothing about rock influences or electropop, the genre is totally biased on someone's personal opinion as with a whole bunch of other disney related articles! my personal opinion is that the song is R&B and pop, but since thers no refs for that, im not gonna change anything, cuz i know that whatever fanatical editor is dominating the article is just gonna do what he/she wants regardless of how thing should be done. 24.139.117.90 (talk) 17:40, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I saw rhe link and where it states its genre. Why do you have such an issue if it is cited right there. Anyways, many other genres and styles have been included in the infoboxes with proper citations indicating them.--173.3.245.196 (talk) 01:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well i read the link and i didnt see electropop to describe give your heart a break, i only saw it on hold up, but ill check again if it makes you feel any better, but if i dont find the reference anywhere im gonna change it again 24.139.117.90 (talk) 22:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
First and foremost, one of the links doesnt work for me (the one thats suppose to go to the unbroken album review by popcrush, however, the other reference did state electropop BEATS, not the same thing as electropop, i understand what you meant but the proper way of putting the article is (genre= Pop, Dance, or Dance pop, since i believe that the combination of both these genres is dance pop [kind of obvious] to make things simple we could put the genre as dance pop, and in the composition section put "Give you heart a break is an uptempo pop and dance ballad that incorporates electropop beats and has influences of Rock music and music of the 90s and 80s. Its instrumentation includes drums and violins." How about it? or something along these lines, but that it basically stays the same as i put it? electropop beats arent the same as electropop music, theres a song by selena gomez and the scene (Round and Round) that incorporates rock and disco beat, however if you hear it, its clearly not rock music, but it does have a disco ish and rock ish vibe, understand? so im gona change it and if you do not agree, then revert the changes and state why you dont agree here in the discussion page, we might be able to come to a happy medium, but we musnt disregard or misunderstand what the reference states, please and thank you 24.139.117.90 (talk) 22:40, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Music video edit

I noticed in the info box it says it comes out 1-23-12. That's today. It hasn't come out yet. Somebody needs to find the release date and fix this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piper Leonard (talkcontribs) 21:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh, never mind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piper Leonard (talkcontribs) 21:28, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Music video release date edit

When will the video for this song release? Thanks, Jayythehuman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayythehuman (talkcontribs) 01:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

gold certification edit

hey give your heart has been certified gold and you havent mentioned it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.98.148.81 (talk) 13:49, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's lie. I'm quit it.--Paparazzzi (talk) 02:45, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi! Give your Heart a Break was certified gold yesterday, please add that. Thanks! 186.52.143.133 (talk) 15:21, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
  Done!--Paparazzzi (talk) 22:44, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Positive reviews not critical acclaim edit

The song received "positive reviews" not critical acclaim. 2-3 critics complimenting the songs doesn't make it critically acclaimed. A song which is critically acclaimed is usually well reviewed by big critics like "the Rolling Stones", Slant Magazine or Spin magazines etc. plus the amount of well reviewers is generally a lot, about 7+. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penpaperpencil (talkcontribs) 13:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

I think so too, especially when the first review listed is not by a big critic. It would need more notable reviews from such big critics to be regarded as critically acclaimed.⊾maine12329⊿ talk 05:30, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Give Your Heart a Break. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Give Your Heart a Break. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply