Talk:Gengoroh Tagame

French coverage

For Malkinann !

<ref name="Dicomanga">{{cite book | first= Christian| last=Marmonnier |page=524| editor=Nicolas Finet | title=Dicomanga: le dictionnaire encyclopédique de la bande dessinée japonaise | publisher=Fleurus | language=French | location=Paris | isbn=978-2-215-07931-6 | year=2008}}</ref> This translation should be removed after use due to Copyvio issue and is only here to help editor to add verifiable elements in the biography using the reference at the top. --KrebMarkt 10:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

"Tagame is openly gay."

Perhaps it's not an appropriate fact for the lead, but it still needs to be cleaned up. It's floating in dead space where it's currently located in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.102.110.129 (talk) 03:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

His sexuality is a central theme throughout his work, so it's an appropriate fact to highlight in the lede. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 11:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gengoroh Tagame. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814025620/http://www.glbtq.com:80/arts/japan_art,2.html to http://www.glbtq.com/arts/japan_art,2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gengoroh Tagame. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.glbtq.com/arts/japan_art,2.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ho-editions.com/caddie/ficheAuteur.php?IDA=73&UID=20090628043115210.49.28.131
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120723153338/http://www.pictureboxinc.com/blogs/pbox-world/2012/07/14/the-passion-of-gengoroh-tagame/ to http://www.pictureboxinc.com/blogs/pbox-world/2012/07/14/the-passion-of-gengoroh-tagame/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 03:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Gengoroh Tagame

• ... that Gengoroh Tagame (pictured), a Japanese artist noted for his gay erotic manga, wrote an acclaimed all-ages manga series in 2014? Source: Kotaku
  • ALT1:... that the pen name of artist Gengoroh Tagame (pictured) is composed of terms for different species of water bugs, which he chose to differentiate himself from the "macho" pen names used by his peers? Source: 10 Magazine
  • ALT2:... that a 1994 manga series by artist Gengoroh Tagame (pictured) was the first gay comic in Japan to turn a profit? Source: The Passion of Gengoroh Tagame: The Master of Gay Erotic Manga
  • ALT3:... that Gengoroh Tagame (pictured) made his debut as a manga artist while still in high school? Source: Hazlitt

• Reviewed: 23 Wall Street

5x expanded by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC).

• Will be claiming this for review and hoping to finish within the next few days, but ALT1 is probably the most attention-grabbing option so far. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

• I think ALT0 or ALT2, the ones that mention 'gay' stuff, are much more attention-grabbing. Many more people care about LGBT issues than about water bugs and pen names. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
• Do you still intend to take up this review, User:Narutolovehinata5? Morgan695 (talk) 17:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Apologies for the delay! I was planning on getting to this yesterday but got caught up in some real-life matters earlier. I'll try to do the review later today, and while I do note Piotrus's comment, I will have to disagree that the water bug angle isn't interesting (in fact I honestly find ALT0 bland compared to ALT1 or ALT2). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 19:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

• The 5x expansion took place on the day of the nomination and the image is freely licensed and acceptable. The only hits I found on Earwig's was the quote which is properly cited. QPQ has been performed. ALT1 and ALT2 are the best hooks: both are cited inline, ALT1 is verified in the source, ALT2 is accepted AGF from an offline source. The final choice of hook is left to the promoter. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gengoroh Tagame/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 18:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey I will be reviewing this article. Review will be soon. Link20XX (talk) 18:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

@Morgan695: I have completed my initial review. Great job overall, just a few things needed before it can be promoted.

Checklist:

Is it well written?

1. A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments:

• In the second paragraph of Themes and Motifs, link the article for the word "pejorative", as I doubt most English speakers know what it means.
• The link for source 3 doesn't appear to work, you may need to get the archive link.
• Optional, but it may be a good idea to replace ’ with '.

That is it. Address each mandatory issue and I will promote it. Link20XX (talk) 02:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@Link20XX: Both mandatory issues have been resolved. Morgan695 (talk) 03:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@Morgan695: The changes resolved both issues. The result of this review is Pass. Congratulations! Link20XX (talk) 03:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)