Do not remove properly sourced text edit

Text has citations and literature will be added, do not remove it.Sourcerery (talk) 17:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sourcerery, it might help if, instead of giving orders, you were to familiarise yourself with some of the details of our verifiability policy. Here are a couple of relevant sentences:
  • All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution.
  • Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source
The text you have re-added has numerous problems: it is translated by someone with insufficient knowledge of the target language to undertake the task, presumably with the aid of moronic online translation software; it is unencyclopaedic in tone and dotted with meaningless WP:PUFFERY such as "The form of Galielo [sic] Chini is practically unique in the panorama of Italian art"; it is not anywhere near adequately cited; and it contains copyright violations, as parts of the Italian article have been copied straight from the Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani. I'm going to remove those now; the rest of it I'll leave for a day or two. Who knows, perhaps you will surprise me: I'll come back and find an encyclopaedic account of this person's life and work, written in fluent and neutral English, and complete with all necessary citations, wikilinks and so on. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:28, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I don't see how saying someone has unique style is puffery, is saying Gaudi has unique style also puffery? Because they both do. Also I don't see how certain theater sets are career defining for Chini, don't see merit in putting them in lead and omitting his probably most important field of work, ceramics.Sourcerery (talk) 18:31, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply