Talk:Fundamental ontology
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Older comments edit
I draw your attention to the fact that the important philosophical atricle of 'Fundamental ontology' exists in German and in Russian Wikipedias. / Sophioman (talk) 21:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- I have added interlanguage links to the two articles. Black Falcon (Talk) 19:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
NB edit
ontology ought to designate fundamental ontology is problematic. It assumes that an ontological analysis of Dasein can ; let alone ought to replace a general ontology. This is contra Heidegger who argues contra Descartes' dualistic ontology. Διοτιμα (talk) 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Edits to "BACKGROUND" section edit
I added intro graph with one source.
I edited next three graphs for clarity. They had and still have, no sources (alas) and are lead-in to long H. quote (primary source). 2602:252:D6A:B2C0:6966:5179:627D:2D84 (talk) 01:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Still working this over as above & etc. Re-writing/ editing material that is unsourced is doubly doubtful, but I think I know originsl writer's intent. I can't really locate new sources with just a phone. 104.228.235.206 (talk) 18:30, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
recent edits edit
the material I added is (with current source note 2) now what Google highights about this article in a google search for FunOnt. Apart from couple of primary source notes, is only sourced material in this srticle. 104.228.235.206 (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC) Continuing my above comments, this article is still quite poor but I've added a fair number of sources 2602:252:D6A:B2C0:79F3:EA73:E11B:17C9 (talk) 15:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)